2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13362-019-0062-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exact viscosity solution to a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman quasi-variational inequality for animal population management

Abstract: We formulate a stochastic impulse control model for animal population management and a candidate of exact solutions to a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman quasi-variational inequality. This model has a qualitatively different functional form of the performance index from the existing monotone ones. So far, optimality and unique solvability of the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman quasi-variational inequality has not been investigated, which are thus addressed in this paper. We present a candidate of exact solutions to the Hamilto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4.2. Note that the conventional 1-D impulse control problems in an infinite horizon assume constant thresholds [44,50,[54][55][56], namely x and x(x) are positive constants, while in ours the latter is not a constant. If both the thresholds are constant, then (39) becomes a policy with a constant x:…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…4.2. Note that the conventional 1-D impulse control problems in an infinite horizon assume constant thresholds [44,50,[54][55][56], namely x and x(x) are positive constants, while in ours the latter is not a constant. If both the thresholds are constant, then (39) becomes a policy with a constant x:…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Applying the classical divergence formula to (30) yields By (31), and taking the limit h → + 0, we infer…”
Section: Fokker-planck Equation and Pdfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interventions that have much shorter time-scales than those of the target dynamics are reasonably considered to be impulsive [2]. Most of the impulse control models assume that the interventions are executed immediately at making the decisions [30,31], while there would be execution delays in real problems due to technical reasons like communication and implementation delays. So far, problems with the execution delay have been studied theoretically from classical [32,33] and viscosity viewpoints [34,35] with dynamic programming [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x t are already found based on some optimality principle because our focus is the stochastic dynamics rather than the optimal policy. These thresholds can be found by solving the HJBQVI [1,2,3,22] associated with (1) and ( 3).…”
Section: Perfect Intervention Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%