2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-1063-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of time series summary statistics as features for clinical prediction tasks

Abstract: Background: Clinical prediction tasks such as patient mortality, length of hospital stay, and disease diagnosis are highly important in critical care research. The existing studies for clinical prediction mainly used simple summary statistics to summarize information from physiological time series. However, this lack of statistics leads to a lack of information. In addition, using only maximum and minimum statistics to indicate patient features fails to provide an adequate explanation. Few studies have evaluat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the variables to be used, we referenced relevant studies [ 7 , 41 , 42 , 44 ] and manually selected 16 quantitative variables based on their clinical importance in the domain from admission, chartevents, labevents, and output events data tables in the MIMIC-III dataset. The variables were Glasgow Coma Scale, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, temperature, FiO 2 , urine output, PO 2 , blood urea nitrogen, white blood cell count, potassium level, sodium level, serum bicarbonate level, bilirubin, admission type, patient’s sex, and age.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To determine the variables to be used, we referenced relevant studies [ 7 , 41 , 42 , 44 ] and manually selected 16 quantitative variables based on their clinical importance in the domain from admission, chartevents, labevents, and output events data tables in the MIMIC-III dataset. The variables were Glasgow Coma Scale, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, temperature, FiO 2 , urine output, PO 2 , blood urea nitrogen, white blood cell count, potassium level, sodium level, serum bicarbonate level, bilirubin, admission type, patient’s sex, and age.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using EHR data to make clinical predictions (e.g., predicting patients’ mortality, hospital stay, disease diagnoses, and onset time) is crucial in intensive care research. In other words, identifying how to effectively predict ICU patient mortality by using EHR data allows medical personnel to accurately assess the patients’ mortality risks, detect high-risk groups early, and implement interventions promptly, improving patient prognoses and enhancing care planning and resource allocation [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As many of these conditions are amenable to early intervention via dietary changes or increased physical activity, there is also interest in using wearables to promote selfawareness and regulation [20] and to enhance screening [11]. Second, wearable-derived measures, such as circadian measures, sleep patterns/quality [11,21], step counts [4], wearable-derived resting heart rate [4,8,10,21,22] and heart rate variability (HRV) [23][24][25][26][27] have been found to correlate with outcomes in cardiometabolic disease. As such, there is increasing recognition in the clinical community to incorporate wearable-derived measures into practical cardiometabolic disease management [6,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, massive volumes of data recorded in electronic health records (EHRs) also supported researchers to design models and algorithms for in-hospital mortality prediction which aim at improving the predicting performance and facilitating the clinical decision making. Outperformance of mortality prediction methods based on machine learning models have been shown by many works [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Some of them show better prediction performance of machine learning models than traditional scoring systems [7,8] and some of them develop various models and machine learning algorithms for mortality prediction [6,[9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outperformance of mortality prediction methods based on machine learning models have been shown by many works [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Some of them show better prediction performance of machine learning models than traditional scoring systems [7,8] and some of them develop various models and machine learning algorithms for mortality prediction [6,[9][10][11][12][13]. Further more, the deep learning models achieve particularly satisfactory performance in ICU mortality prediction tasks due to their strong ability of capturing non-linear patterns hidden in data [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%