2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2877447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An End-to-End Model Based on Improved Adaptive Deep Belief Network and Its Application to Bearing Fault Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If there are a small number of particles, the search range of the PSO algorithm is small, which makes it difficult to obtain solutions that meet the expected goals. The eigenvalues extracted when the sliding window size is 360 are used as the input data of the PSO-ANN model, and different particle swarm numbers (10,20,30,40,50, and 60, respectively) are used to initialize the PSO-ANN model for multifeature fusion fault prediction. The relationship between the number of iterations of the PSO algorithm initialized by different numbers of particles and the loss value of the ANN is shown in Figure 9 (the maximum number of iterations of the PSO algorithm was uniformly set to 100).…”
Section: Feature-level Fusion Fault Prediction Experiments Based On a mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If there are a small number of particles, the search range of the PSO algorithm is small, which makes it difficult to obtain solutions that meet the expected goals. The eigenvalues extracted when the sliding window size is 360 are used as the input data of the PSO-ANN model, and different particle swarm numbers (10,20,30,40,50, and 60, respectively) are used to initialize the PSO-ANN model for multifeature fusion fault prediction. The relationship between the number of iterations of the PSO algorithm initialized by different numbers of particles and the loss value of the ANN is shown in Figure 9 (the maximum number of iterations of the PSO algorithm was uniformly set to 100).…”
Section: Feature-level Fusion Fault Prediction Experiments Based On a mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, widely-used mechanical fault prediction methods employ artificial neural networks (ANNs) [4][5][6], support vector machines (SVMs) [7,8], deep learning [9][10][11], and other artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. For example, Ben et al [12] proposed the use of empirical mode decomposition and energy entropy for feature extraction, which was combined with an ANN for multifeature fusion to make bearing fault predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the data acquisition step, vibration signals, motor current signals, temperature signals and acoustic emission signals are frequently used for analysis [ 5 , 6 ]. In the feature extraction step, statistical time domain features such as root mean square, skewness as well as kurtosis [ 7 ] and frequency domain features exposed by Fourier transform [ 8 ] are the common choices to feed to the diagnosis models. To some extent, these features can effectively distinguish the primary differences between various health conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven fault diagnosis methods based on machine learning have also been intensively developed in recent years [18]. Fault classifiers based on decision trees (DT) [19], [20], support vector machine (SVM) [21], [22], k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) [23], [24], convolutional neural network (CNN) [25]- [27] and deep belief networks (DBN) [28], [29] are well applied to deal with bearing fault detection. All mentioned machine learning based methods require historical failure data for training, which is hard to obtain in industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%