2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1320721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Investigation of Environmental Performance and the Market Value of the Firm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
273
4
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(302 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
18
273
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Inconsistent results address the association between CESP and financial performance (Graves & Waddock, 1999), such that studies report weak positive (Preston, 1978), neutral (Orliztky & Benjamin, 2001), or even negative (Patten, 2002) associations. Similar relationship patterns emerge from assessments of environmental performance, in that previous findings report positive (Al-Najjar & Anfimiadou, 2012;King & Lenox, 2002;Nakao, Amano, Matsumura, Genba & Nakano, 2007), quasi-neutral (Jacobs, Singhal, & Subramanian, 2010), and negative (Filbeck & Gorman, 2004;Hassel et al, 2005) links. Other studies indicate that causality might run both ways, such that strong financial performance facilitates the firm's engagement in CESP (Waddock & Graves, 1997) or environmental performance (Nakao et al, 2007), which in turn might reinforce positive financial performance (AlNajjar & Anfimiadou, 2012;French, Schwert & Stambaugh, 1987;Margolis et al, 2007;Nakao et al, 2007;Orlitzky et al, 2003;Waddock & Graves, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Inconsistent results address the association between CESP and financial performance (Graves & Waddock, 1999), such that studies report weak positive (Preston, 1978), neutral (Orliztky & Benjamin, 2001), or even negative (Patten, 2002) associations. Similar relationship patterns emerge from assessments of environmental performance, in that previous findings report positive (Al-Najjar & Anfimiadou, 2012;King & Lenox, 2002;Nakao, Amano, Matsumura, Genba & Nakano, 2007), quasi-neutral (Jacobs, Singhal, & Subramanian, 2010), and negative (Filbeck & Gorman, 2004;Hassel et al, 2005) links. Other studies indicate that causality might run both ways, such that strong financial performance facilitates the firm's engagement in CESP (Waddock & Graves, 1997) or environmental performance (Nakao et al, 2007), which in turn might reinforce positive financial performance (AlNajjar & Anfimiadou, 2012;French, Schwert & Stambaugh, 1987;Margolis et al, 2007;Nakao et al, 2007;Orlitzky et al, 2003;Waddock & Graves, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…There seems to be a necessity to incorporate a proper combination of different types of activities, instead of simply maximizing the intensity of any existing environmental protection per se [39][40][41].…”
Section: Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, research suggests that stakeholder pressure, attainment of green certifications (such as ISO 14001), and adoption of environmental management system (EMS) are some of the principal drivers that improve firms' quests to improve sustainability (Marcus and Fremeth 2009;Jabbour et al 2013;Yang, Lin, Chan, and Sheu 2010). Such drivers not only facilitate firms' abilities to meet environmental targets but also positively influence their financial performance (Jacobs, Singhal and Subramanian 2010). However, a majority of firms still consider environmental initiatives as a burden on their profit potentials and adopt short-term compliance strategies to meet targets set by the regulatory authorities (Marcus and Fremeth 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%