2008
DOI: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2008.tb00081.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Examination of Supply Chain Performance Along Several Dimensions of Risk

Abstract: This research operationalizes several supply chain risk sources and investigates their relationships with supply chain performance. The responses of 760 executives from firms operating in Germany reveal that demand side and supply side risks do have a negative impact on performance whereas regulatory, legal and bureaucratic risks, infrastructure risks, as well as catastrophic risks do not. The analysis and results augment previous research regarding the impact of supply chain risks on the operational performan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
681
6
22

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 713 publications
(788 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
16
681
6
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Capacity constraints in supply chains arise frequently and cause significant economic loss through associated delivery delays/short supply to customers (Chopra and Sodhi, 2004;Wagner and Bode, 2008). They are also difficult to avoid given that knowledge of echelon capacities is dispersed across the supply chain (Norrman and Jansson, 2004), and market demand and operations failures that cause capacity constraints are unpredictable in nature.…”
Section: Problem Statement and Capacity Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capacity constraints in supply chains arise frequently and cause significant economic loss through associated delivery delays/short supply to customers (Chopra and Sodhi, 2004;Wagner and Bode, 2008). They are also difficult to avoid given that knowledge of echelon capacities is dispersed across the supply chain (Norrman and Jansson, 2004), and market demand and operations failures that cause capacity constraints are unpredictable in nature.…”
Section: Problem Statement and Capacity Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wright (2013) states that robustness to supply chain disruptions is considered to be a key priority in this ever-changing business environment. Having material on hand or inventory means carrying costs composed of the cost of capital, stores, personnel salaries, facilities, field delivery, obsolescence of inventory, information systems, utilities, insurance, security, and so on (Wagner & Bode, 2008;Narasimhan & Talluri, 2009).…”
Section: Increased Adherence To Schedulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of a contemporary aspect that could have tremendous impact on the long term vulnerability of supply chain systems are the environmental impact and related sustainability of the systems, e.g., as denoted through new carbon footprint measures (Asbjørnslett, 2008). Vulnerability of modern supply chains can subsequently result in supply chain disruptions and detrimental effects for firms (Hendricks and Singhal, 2005;Wagner and Bode, 2008). Now the question which appears is how much risk one is ready to abide to improve efficiency of supply chain, in proportion to increased vulnerability?…”
Section: Vulnerability Analysis Of Supply Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%