Proceedings of the 29th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2642937.2643019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Regression test selection speeds up regression testing by rerunning only the tests that can be affected by the most recent code changes. Much progress has been made on research in automated test selection over the last three decades, but it has not translated into practical tools that are widely adopted. Therefore, developers either re-run all tests after each change or perform manual test selection. Re-running all tests is expensive, while manual test selection is tedious and error-prone. Despite such a big t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We now present our results and compare them to the three previous case studies of Beller et al [2015], Blondeau et al [2017], Gligoric et al [2014].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We now present our results and compare them to the three previous case studies of Beller et al [2015], Blondeau et al [2017], Gligoric et al [2014].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…We have 20 participants. So, our study is closer to the third paper Gligoric et al [2014] which have 14 developers as participants. The second paper Beller et al [2015] have 48.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations