2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical comparison of alternative schemes for combining electricity spot price forecasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact is a good motivation for considering combining electricity spot price forecasts. Surprisingly, this approach has not been undertaken in the literature until very recently, see Bordignon et al (2013), Nowotarski et al (2014) and Raviv et al (2013). All three cited papers yield similar conclusions-they support the benefits of combining forecasts for deriving more accurate and more robust point forecasts of electricity spot prices.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This fact is a good motivation for considering combining electricity spot price forecasts. Surprisingly, this approach has not been undertaken in the literature until very recently, see Bordignon et al (2013), Nowotarski et al (2014) and Raviv et al (2013). All three cited papers yield similar conclusions-they support the benefits of combining forecasts for deriving more accurate and more robust point forecasts of electricity spot prices.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Thus, the set of individual techniques considered here includes the 12 models analyzed by Weron and Misiorek (2008) and then used in the context of averaging point forecasts by Nowotarski et al (2014): autoregressive models (AR, ARX-the latter with temperature as the eXogenous variable), spike preprocessed autoregressive models (p-AR, p-ARX; where the model structure was estimated after replacing price spikes with less extreme observations), threshold autoregressive models (TAR, TARX), meanreverting jump diffusions (MRJD, MRJDX) and two classes of semiparametric autoregressive models (IHMAR, IHMARX, SNAR, SNARX; introduced by Weron and Misiorek 2008). In this study, we also use two of those individual models-ARX and SNARX-as benchmarks for comparison of the prediction intervals.…”
Section: Individual Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed quantification of uncertainty departs from a probabilistic assessment in Bayesian terms. The Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) method is a well-established concept which already has been applied in energy economics [2,3]. By intention, the method presented is not novel and relies on accepted concepts and theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…epistemic uncertainty. 3 Although assessment methods for epistemic uncertainty have been proposed in other contexts [34], these methods do not seem to be applicable in energy modelling. By epistemic uncertainties in the context of energy models I mean a form of under-determinism or "notknowability" of decisive influences on the energy system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%