1997
DOI: 10.1007/s003960050149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An electroconductivity study on degree of counterion binding or dissociation of a-sulfonatomyristic acid methyl ester micelles in water as a function of temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In an early study of 12-s-12 and 16-s-16 dimers the micelle ionization degree was obtained from the K vs C plots and taken as (41). However, it has been recently shown that this method yields values of α that are overestimated because the conductivity of the micelles is underestimated (42). The reported values of α have therefore been discarded and the conductivity data reanalyzed using the method of Evans (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an early study of 12-s-12 and 16-s-16 dimers the micelle ionization degree was obtained from the K vs C plots and taken as (41). However, it has been recently shown that this method yields values of α that are overestimated because the conductivity of the micelles is underestimated (42). The reported values of α have therefore been discarded and the conductivity data reanalyzed using the method of Evans (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the α value, 0.51, obtained for SDMS is smaller than that value, 0.64, obtained by the slope below and above the cmc from the plot of specific conductance vs. molar concentration (1), because the conductivity of the micelles is underestimated (29). Figures 5A and 5B show the potentiometric titration curves for 212 and SDMA.…”
Section: A B Cmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A reported set of α values was obtained assuming α equal to the ratio of the slopes of the specific conductivity vs concentration plot above and below cmc (4). It has been recently shown that the values of α so obtained are overestimated (46). These values have therefore been discarded and the conductivity data reanalyzed using the method of Evans (47) that yields more realistic values of α.…”
Section: Thermodynamics Of Micellization Of 12-s-12 Surfactantsmentioning
confidence: 97%