2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient method for Contingency-Constrained Transmission Expansion Planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…• MILP El SEP necesita una adecuada planificación que debe ser realizada a largo plazo, considerando combinar los sistemas de transmisión y generación para abastecer en el futuro. [19] Realizarlo de esta manera permitirá tener una operación confiable y viablemente económica. La solución para este inconveniente del TEP será desarrollada mediante MILP.…”
Section: Solucionesunclassified
“…• MILP El SEP necesita una adecuada planificación que debe ser realizada a largo plazo, considerando combinar los sistemas de transmisión y generación para abastecer en el futuro. [19] Realizarlo de esta manera permitirá tener una operación confiable y viablemente económica. La solución para este inconveniente del TEP será desarrollada mediante MILP.…”
Section: Solucionesunclassified
“…GTEP determines optimal location, capacity, and time of new investment in generation and transmission network. These two issues have been studied independently in the past in some approaches, [7][8][9][10] but since generation and transmission planning are interdependent, it makes sense to study them simultaneously. 11,12 Typically, the GTEP problem is a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) formulation aimed at minimizing investment and operation costs.…”
Section: Mgs In Distribution Gridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraint (2) represents the power flow balance at each bus of the system in each scenario, i.e., the application of Kirchhoff's current law to the system; constraint (3) represents the application of Kirchhoff's voltage law to the fundamental loops of the base topology, formed by the existing lines of each corridor and the loads at their terminal buses, in each scenario; and constraint (4) is the power flow limit for the existing lines of the base topology. Constraint (5) represents the application of Kirchhoff's voltage law to the fundamental loops of the candidate network, formed by each candidate line and the loads at its terminal buses, in each scenario, while (6) represents the power flow limits for the candidate lines. Note that when , = 0, in (6), , , = 0, and in (5), , and , are independent.…”
Section: =1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some propose new planning models, which in addition to their technical aspects, also depend on policy and regulatory issues, such as market-driven expansion models [1]. �e TNEP problem can become even more complex when considerations such as multi-stage planning [2] or planning with N-1 security constraints [3]- [5] are taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%