2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective iterated greedy method for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of applying a simple simulated annealing criterion to the IG algorithm [40] , Lin et al [34] used an acceptance criterion with a settling temperature value and included the number of elements to be removed in the destruction step as a variable. Ruben et al [7] employed an improved IG algorithm to optimize the makespan of DPFSP. Jing et al [41] adopted an improved IG algorithm to solve the DPFSP with windows.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead of applying a simple simulated annealing criterion to the IG algorithm [40] , Lin et al [34] used an acceptance criterion with a settling temperature value and included the number of elements to be removed in the destruction step as a variable. Ruben et al [7] employed an improved IG algorithm to optimize the makespan of DPFSP. Jing et al [41] adopted an improved IG algorithm to solve the DPFSP with windows.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraint (6) describes the start time and completion time of a job processing. Constraint (7) represents that the start time must be equal or greater than the completion time of two adjacent jobs on a certain machine. Constraint (8) describes the constraints between the start time and completion time of the job, including preparation time.…”
Section: Sdst-dpfsp Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraints ( 9)-( 12) define the start time of each job in the considered flowshop. Constraints ( 13)- (15) define the relationship between x ir and y ijr for sequencedependent setup times. Constraints ( 16) and ( 17) compute the completion time and tardiness of jobs.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-machine flowshop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times (SDSTs) to minimize the makespan is very similar to the typical travel salesman problem (TSP) [4], and dynamic programming methods [5,6] and branch and bound algorithms [7,8] have been proposed to obtain optimal solutions for the problem. However, since finding optimal solutions of the flowshop problem with SDST requires considerably long computation times, recent studies have focused on development of metaheuristic algorithms: genetic algorithms [9][10][11], variable neighborhood search algorithm [12], migrating bird optimization algorithm [13], discrete artificial bee colony optimization [14], iterated greedy algorithm [15][16][17], and local search based heuristic algorithm [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, meta-heuristics have been used to solve COPs because this method can reasonably find a feasible solution within an acceptable timeframe [2][3][4] . The Swarm Intelligence (SI) algorithms, which are used to address continuous optimization problems or COPs, are widely studied and effective to address large-scale problems [5,6] . The SI algorithms are inspired by the laws of human intelligence and social or natural phenomena in biological groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%