2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04840-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effect of serotonergic stimulation on learning rates for rewards apparent after long intertrial intervals

Abstract: Serotonin has widespread, but computationally obscure, modulatory effects on learning and cognition. Here, we studied the impact of optogenetic stimulation of dorsal raphe serotonin neurons in mice performing a non-stationary, reward-driven decision-making task. Animals showed two distinct choice strategies. Choices after short inter-trial-intervals (ITIs) depended only on the last trial outcome and followed a win-stay-lose-switch pattern. In contrast, choices after long ITIs reflected outcome history over mul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
92
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
7
92
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6f-h). Moreover, only the lateral bias showed a dependence on the length of the previous intertrial interval (ITI) 37 : while both after-correct and after-error lateral biases became more positive for longer ITIs (i.e., favoring more repetitions), the transition bias remained unaffected ( Supplementary Fig. 2d).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6f-h). Moreover, only the lateral bias showed a dependence on the length of the previous intertrial interval (ITI) 37 : while both after-correct and after-error lateral biases became more positive for longer ITIs (i.e., favoring more repetitions), the transition bias remained unaffected ( Supplementary Fig. 2d).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speed was also considered because of the tight relationship between pupil size and locomotion. Finally, the number of rewards was included as a predictor since 5-HT effects have been linked to reward valuation [33,43]. Predictors were z-scored before fitting the data.…”
Section: Multivariate Linear Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a hierarchical Bayesian, random effects analysis. [51][52][53] In this, the (suitably transformed) parameters h i of participant i are treated as a random sample from a Gaussian distribution with means and variance θ θ θ = {µ µ µ θ , Σ Σ Σ θ } characterising the whole population of subjects; and we find the maximum likelihood values of θ θ θ.…”
Section: Behavioral Model Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used each subject's maximum a posteriori (MAP) parameters, based on an hierarchical model fit, [51][52][53] to estimate subject-specific time courses of several variables, including the two separate value signals in our model: (i) discounted boosted-anticipatory value during wait periods (ii) discounted reward value during the same periods, and (iii) prediction errors at cue presentation. These signals were convolved with SPM's default canonical HRF ( Figure 1H; see Figure S4 for an example).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%