Social Collective Intelligence 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08681-1_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Auditable Reputation Service for Collective Adaptive Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, the models proposed for these systems rely on distributed notions of trust and reputation. More precisely, trust management is distributed over all the nodes, which may collaborate with each others in order to exchange and aggregate personal opinions, calculate trust scores of target nodes, and disseminate such values [24,28,8,21]. For instance, trustworthy sensor networks base their ability to collectively process sensed data on decentralized reputation systems [9,29,11,26,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the models proposed for these systems rely on distributed notions of trust and reputation. More precisely, trust management is distributed over all the nodes, which may collaborate with each others in order to exchange and aggregate personal opinions, calculate trust scores of target nodes, and disseminate such values [24,28,8,21]. For instance, trustworthy sensor networks base their ability to collectively process sensed data on decentralized reputation systems [9,29,11,26,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Packer et al discussed provenance for CAS and argued that provenance data helps in making CAS more transparent and accountable, and also help in assessment of users' trust. The authors argue that provenance makes systems more accountable as provenance data provides information about the use of data and decision‐making processes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Missier and Moreau 23 discussed a concrete scenario of social computing; they also argued that some concepts, such as task delegations and incentives, are still problematic to express using Prov-DM. Packer et al discussed provenance for CAS 40 and argued that provenance data helps in making CAS more transparent and accountable, and also help in assessment of users' trust. The authors argue that provenance makes systems more accountable as provenance data provides information about the use of data and decision-making processes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another work by Garijo also extends the use of PROV-O for documenting workflow plans in terms of steps and variables, known as P-PLAN [18]. Packer et al developed a provenance ontology in social computations domain with the aim to measure a community based-service reputation [19]. This ontology is used to explain entities used in social computation.…”
Section: A Provenancementioning
confidence: 99%