2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-021-06328-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An attention-based CNN-LSTM model for subjectivity detection in opinion-mining

Abstract: Opinion-mining generally refers to analyzing opinions on various topics available in the form of text. It is an essential operation of natural language processing since it enables efficient decision-making and planning for users and businesses. Opinion-mining can be made more comfortable and more effective by initially performing subjectivity detection, i.e., identifying the text as subjective or objective. An opinion-mining model can better identify the opinions present in the remaining subjective statements … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To show the fault checking results and evaluate the model performance, two metrics, Fault Diagnosis Rate (FDR) and False Positive Rate (FPR), were used to evaluate the model performance. FDR and FPR are defined in [21].…”
Section: Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show the fault checking results and evaluate the model performance, two metrics, Fault Diagnosis Rate (FDR) and False Positive Rate (FPR), were used to evaluate the model performance. FDR and FPR are defined in [21].…”
Section: Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These applications typically involve a significant number of labels, and the number of labels continues to increase with new applications. Therefore, describing samples with only a single label is challenging [38]. In this study, we address the problem of dual-label classification in the context of scientometric classification of literature, where labels for research content and method must be assigned to each document with high descriptive accuracy.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is down-sampled or pooled feature maps that highlight the most present feature in the field, rather than the average presence of the feature as in the case of average pooling. In practice, this method has been shown to perform better than average pooling in automated feature extraction, such as feature extraction in text mining applications [37,38].…”
Section: Deep Learning For Literature Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we present the details of our deep neural network for citation context classification. We proposed a CNN [53,54] model by employing fastText pre-trained embedding vectors. To handle the data imbalance, we employed using two different stateof-the-art techniques such as class-weight and customized focal loss function to improve the model accuracy.…”
Section: Deep-learning-based Citation Classification Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%