2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An asteroseismic study of the β Cephei star β Canis Majoris

Abstract: Aims. We present the results of a detailed analysis of 452 ground-based high-resolution high S/N spectroscopic measurements spread over 4.5 years for β Canis Majoris with the aim to determine the pulsational characteristics of this star, and to use them to derive seismic constraints on the stellar parameters. Methods. We determine pulsation frequencies in the Si III 4553 Å line with Fourier methods. We identify the m-value of the modes by taking into account the photometric identifications of the degrees ℓ. To… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
51
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(54 reference statements)
5
51
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The typical amount of convective core overshoot required to match observations is about α co = 0.2 and is consistent with measurements for the β Cep stars β CMa (Mazumdar et al 2006) and δ Ceti , as well as for classical Cepheids (Cassisi & Salaris 2011;Neilson et al 2011;Neilson & Langer 2012;Prada Moroni et al 2012) and other stars. However, measurements for other β Cep stars require different amounts of overshoot: θ Oph α co = 0.4 (Briquet et al 2007) 0.28H P (Lovekin & Goupil 2010), HD 129929 α co = 0.1 (Aerts et al 2003), and ν Eridani α co = 0.28 (Suárez et al 2009), among others.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The typical amount of convective core overshoot required to match observations is about α co = 0.2 and is consistent with measurements for the β Cep stars β CMa (Mazumdar et al 2006) and δ Ceti , as well as for classical Cepheids (Cassisi & Salaris 2011;Neilson et al 2011;Neilson & Langer 2012;Prada Moroni et al 2012) and other stars. However, measurements for other β Cep stars require different amounts of overshoot: θ Oph α co = 0.4 (Briquet et al 2007) 0.28H P (Lovekin & Goupil 2010), HD 129929 α co = 0.1 (Aerts et al 2003), and ν Eridani α co = 0.28 (Suárez et al 2009), among others.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Further details on the data acquisition and reduction procedures can be found in Aerts et al (2004a; ν Eri), Mazumdar et al (2006;β CMa), Saesen et al (2006;ξ 1 CMa), Aerts et al (2004b;V836 Cen), Neiner et al, in prep. (V2052 Oph) and Desmet et al,in prep.…”
Section: Observational Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using observations by the MOST satellite, Aerts et al (2006) were able to place constraints on the physical parameters of δ Ceti, including constraining the convective core overshoot (α ov = 0.2 ± 0.05). Seismic modeling of β CMa has constrained the core overshoot to α ov = 0.2 ± 0.05, as well as placing constraints on the mass and age of the star (Mazumdar et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%