1990
DOI: 10.1016/0309-1740(90)90061-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of the role of pH differences in determining the relative tenderness of meat from bulls and steers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
95
3
24

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
17
95
3
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Herring et al (1965) reported that a decrease in sarcomere length, due to the shortening of the muscle, results in a larger muscle fibre diameter and therefore less tender meat. Several other studies are in agreement with Herring et al (1965) regarding the influence of sarcomere length on the tenderness of meat (Locker and Hagyard 1963;Purchas 1990). Furthermore, literature also indicates a negative relationship between the amount of fibres present in muscle and the tenderness of meat.…”
Section: Fibre Types and Meat Qualitysupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Herring et al (1965) reported that a decrease in sarcomere length, due to the shortening of the muscle, results in a larger muscle fibre diameter and therefore less tender meat. Several other studies are in agreement with Herring et al (1965) regarding the influence of sarcomere length on the tenderness of meat (Locker and Hagyard 1963;Purchas 1990). Furthermore, literature also indicates a negative relationship between the amount of fibres present in muscle and the tenderness of meat.…”
Section: Fibre Types and Meat Qualitysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This condition is also known to have a detrimental effect on the tenderness of meat as the high pH creates a very rigid structure. The research by Purchas (1990) also concluded that the tenderness of meat decreases as the ultimate pH increases from 5.5 to 6.2 while Yu and Lee (1986) found that at an ultimate pH between 5.8 and 6.3, tenderness is at its lowest. This is mainly related to the influence of the ultimate pH on the activity of the proteolytic enzymes which, at these higher values, is not optimum for their activity.…”
Section: Stress and Meat Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smulders et al, 1990;Devine, 1994;Watanabe et al, 1996). Within the normal range (non-DFD) for ultimate pH in beef and red deer M. longissimus, values around 5.5 have been reported to yield more tender meat than in the 5.8-6.0 range (Purchas, 1990;Jeremiah et al, 1991;Barnier et al, 1992;. In a red deer study it was indicated that the tenderness profile change after ageing at 4 °C was similar to that reported for lamb, in that all LD samples tenderised to an acceptable level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, muscle pH values measured at 7 and 24 h post mortem and after thawing, and muscle temperature values measured at 2, 4, 7 and 24 h post mortem and after thawing there were no differences between the two treatments. Better meat quality, especially meat tenderness, is correlated with the rate of decline in pH and muscle temperature with time (Purchas, 1990). In the present study the initial muscle pH values were recorded at 2 h post mortem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%