2017
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)-endorsed definition of clinically important worsening in axial spondyloarthritis based on ASDAS

Abstract: This data-driven ASAS consensus process resulted in an ASDAS-based cut-off value defining clinically important worsening in axSpA for use in trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the dermatological domain, clear cut-off values for important worsening are lacking for mBSA and treatment is adjusted as judged by the treating rheumatologist and patient, since this is a very individual choice. AxSpA flare is defined as an increase in ASDAS ≥ 0.9 (the published MCIW for ASDAS) [31,32]. We consider our flare criteria rather sensitive and therefore think we can detect any significant flare.…”
Section: Definition Of Flarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the dermatological domain, clear cut-off values for important worsening are lacking for mBSA and treatment is adjusted as judged by the treating rheumatologist and patient, since this is a very individual choice. AxSpA flare is defined as an increase in ASDAS ≥ 0.9 (the published MCIW for ASDAS) [31,32]. We consider our flare criteria rather sensitive and therefore think we can detect any significant flare.…”
Section: Definition Of Flarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At baseline, sex, age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, HLA-B27 status, smoking status, and history of extraarticular manifestations (uveitis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, peripheral arthritis, and enthesitis) were recorded. Disease activity was assessed using the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) according to CRP level [20]. Of the total sample, 253 patients who were followed for 2 years were assessed for radiographic progression.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, if a patient experienced a severe adverse event by the time of discontinuation, this was selected as main reason even if ASDAS-An alternative de nition of secondary failure to the rst TNFi was used in a sensitivity analysis. A patient was considered to have a secondary failure if he/she experienced a are (ASAS de nition, 0.9 point increase in ASDAS between two consecutive timepoints), [15] comparing to the immediately preceding visit (or to 2 previous visits, if the preceding was missing for ASDAS), at least once, after achieving ASDAS-CII at 3 or 6 months.…”
Section: Reason To Discontinue Tnfimentioning
confidence: 99%