“…Displacement of one or two CO ligands of diiron dithiolate complexes by other ligands makes the iron centers more protophilic and the reduction potentials of the complexes much more negative (À1.9 to À2.7 V vs. Fc/Fc + ) [7,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][33][34][35]. Although much effort has focused on adjusting the redox potential, the protophilicity, and the water solubility of diiron dithiolate model complexes by CO-displacement with various ligands, such as cyanide [6][7][8]28], tertiary phosphines and phosphites [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], N-heterocyclic carbenes [16][17][18][19][20], isocyanides [21,22], and 1,10-phenanthroline [23], little work has been reported on tuning the reactivity and the electrochemical property of the diiron center by varying the S-to-S linker [38][39][40][41][42][43]. It was reported that the bdtbridged (bdt = benzene-1,2-dithiolato) diiron dithiolate complex (l-bdt)Fe 2 (CO) 6 showed the first reduction event at À1.44 V vs. Fc/Fc + with a 220 mV positive shift in comparison to the pdt-bridged complex (l-pdt)Fe 2 (CO) 6 [35], indicating that the reduction potential of the iron center in the diiron dithiolate complexes can be effectively tuned less negative b...…”