2016
DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2016.070901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach for Energy Efficient Dynamic Virtual Machine Consolidation in Cloud Environment

Abstract: Abstract-Nowadays, as the use of cloud computing service becomes more extensive and the customers welcome this service, an increasing trend in energy consumption and operational costs of these centers may be seen. To reduce operational costs, the providers should decrease energy consumption to an extent that Service Level Agreement (SLA) maintains at a desirable level. This paper adopts the virtual machine consolidation problem in cloud computing data centers as a solution to achieve this goal, putting forward… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are research works undertaken by Wang et al (2013) and Nikzad (2016) which are more related to our work. Hence, before discussing our proposed methodology, a brief over view of these works is presented.…”
Section: Proposed Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are research works undertaken by Wang et al (2013) and Nikzad (2016) which are more related to our work. Hence, before discussing our proposed methodology, a brief over view of these works is presented.…”
Section: Proposed Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ferdaus et al (2017) has proposed Hierarchical Decentralized Dynamic VS Consolidation Framework, where they discussed how the global controller does the decision making for VS consolidation. Nikzad (2016) has proposed adaptive VS selection, where the authors have considered adaptive two-level threshold and using this threshold they categorized the hosts as troublemaker host. The authors categorized the host as troublemaker (over utilized) host.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The servers in the solution proposed by the author [10] do not consider decisions from another server before taking decision for VM migration. The authors in [11] proposed adaptive VM migration, where they considered adaptive two-level threshold. They considered this threshold to identify the servers as a troublemaking server (over utilized).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They considered this threshold to identify the servers as a troublemaking server (over utilized). This server is categorized as trouble making at present instance or in future [11]. The author has considered the server as input and predicted its future regarding whether the server needs VM migration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation