2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10761-018-0458-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Appraisal of the Indigenous Acquisition of Contact-Era European Metal Objects in Southeastern North America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The post-1540 Indigenous social terrain was one of heterogeneity in networks, motives, interaction, and engagement in diverse socio-material realms. Contributing to this complexity, as recently pointed out, is bias in the interpretation of European materials distributed among Indigenous communities rooted in the overreliance on mortuary assemblages (Legg et al 2019), further complicating and problematizing the use of materials as markers of time and temporality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The post-1540 Indigenous social terrain was one of heterogeneity in networks, motives, interaction, and engagement in diverse socio-material realms. Contributing to this complexity, as recently pointed out, is bias in the interpretation of European materials distributed among Indigenous communities rooted in the overreliance on mortuary assemblages (Legg et al 2019), further complicating and problematizing the use of materials as markers of time and temporality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, we must “embrace anomalous data” and cases that challenge long-standing typological frameworks and narratives (Nassaney 2018:55). Fortunately, contemporary studies of Indigenous-colonizer dynamics across the southeastern United States—and North America more broadly—are now emphasizing both historical contingency at a local scale and histories that are writ large across regions (e.g., Beck 2013; Beck et al 2016, 2017; Boudreaux et al 2020; Cobb 2019; Ethridge and Shuck-Hall 2009; Hofman and Keehnen 2019; Legg et al 2019; Manning and Hart 2019; Thompson et al 2018; Thompson, Marquardt et al 2019; Walder and Yann 2018).…”
Section: Toward Absolute Temporalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archaeological investigations suggest that Stark Farms represents a dispersed town or loosely aggregated house groups spread across a substantial upland prairie ridge system. With the onset of our metal detector survey in 2015 at the largest of the Stark Farms sites, 22OK778, we almost immediately discovered iron celts, reworked Biscayanstyle axes, rolled sheet copper-alloy beads, and other metal artifacts (Legg et al 2019). These finds instigated five seasons (2015)(2016)(2017)(2018)(2019) of fieldwork at Stark Farms, with the Chickasaw Nation leading a consortium consisting of the Universities of Mississippi, South Carolina, and Florida.…”
Section: Archaeology At Stark Farmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that we first published a descriptive analysis of a portion of the metal artifact assemblage (Legg et al 2019) in a comparative study with the contemporary Glass site (Georgia) to demonstrate that mechanisms in addition to gifting may have been an important factor in the occurrence of metal objects on sixteenth-century Indigenous sites. In a more recent study (Legg et al 2020), we provided a more thorough descriptive analysis of the assemblage and its context to make the argument that it was probably linked to the Hernando do Soto entrada.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items initially traded between Native communities and colonists, furthermore, quickly found their way into Indigenous trade networks, and European trade goods and weapons that had originally been held and circulated within elite-based gift-exchange networks became indispensable for daily life, leading to the formation of new entangled relationships between people and materials (see, e.g. Legg et al, 2019). Excavations of an Occaneechi settlement at Fredrick's Site in North Carolina have yielded a range of European materials ranging from guns and gun parts, to lead shot and gunflints, to everyday tools such as knives, hoes, bottles, and spoons and over ten thousand glass beads-a ubiquitous and inexpensive commodity that was sought by Native communities (Ward & Davis Jr., 1993;429: Beck, 2013: 173-74).…”
Section: Living In a Broken World: Shatter Zones In Colonial North Americamentioning
confidence: 99%