2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An application of the recreation level of service approach to forests in Israel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion of carrying capacity implies a threshold of visitor numbers that corresponds to the maximum level of use that a destination can accommodate without unacceptable alteration in environmental aspects or in the quality of visitor experience (Saeþórsdóttir, 2010). Despite the fact that carrying capacity indicators are considered as a crucial tool for determining levels of use and monitoring tourism development, there are many reservations expressed about the possibility of singling out consistent thresholds and clear benchmarks for quantifying carrying capacity (Fleishman & Feitelson, 2009;Manning et al, 2002). A number of studies attempted to incorporate stochastic and fuzzy decision rules in the estimation of carrying capacity to account for variability and uncertainty in observed indicators (Prato, 2001(Prato, , 2009.…”
Section: How Many Visitors Are Enough?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The notion of carrying capacity implies a threshold of visitor numbers that corresponds to the maximum level of use that a destination can accommodate without unacceptable alteration in environmental aspects or in the quality of visitor experience (Saeþórsdóttir, 2010). Despite the fact that carrying capacity indicators are considered as a crucial tool for determining levels of use and monitoring tourism development, there are many reservations expressed about the possibility of singling out consistent thresholds and clear benchmarks for quantifying carrying capacity (Fleishman & Feitelson, 2009;Manning et al, 2002). A number of studies attempted to incorporate stochastic and fuzzy decision rules in the estimation of carrying capacity to account for variability and uncertainty in observed indicators (Prato, 2001(Prato, , 2009.…”
Section: How Many Visitors Are Enough?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional difficulties in determining carrying capacity include uncorrelated crowding perceptions with actual visitor numbers and differences among various visitor groups in tolerating crowding (Leujak & Ormond, 2007). A final remark concerning the contribution carrying capacity in adaptive management relates to its reactive nature (Fleishman & Feitelson, 2009;Lawson et al, 2003): remediary action is initiated only after standards of quality have been violated or are close to be violated. A question that arises at this point is how carrying capacity can still be regarded as an important management tool in the light of all these reservations concerning its estimation.…”
Section: How Many Visitors Are Enough?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effort has often been mentioned as defining and managing recreational carrying capacity [10]. The main purpose of this research is to analyze the carrying capacity of Erzurum Urban Forest with using Level of Service (LOS) as a new management technique that focuses on recreation experience [11]. The study has three goals in the scope of main purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By defining indicators and standards of quality, recreational areas can be pleasingly planned, monitored, and managed. Also, indicators of quality can be monitored over time, and if appropriate, management action can be taken in a way not to exceed standards of quality [11]- [32]. In an attempt to estimate the total visitor satisfaction of visitors, Fleishman and Feitelson (2003) [11] adapted Level of Service (LOS) to recreation areas as a new management technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation