2010
DOI: 10.1118/1.3429056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical model of the effects of pulse pileup on the energy spectrum recorded by energy resolved photon counting x‐ray detectors

Abstract: Purpose: Recently, novel CdTe photon counting x-ray detectors ͑PCXDs͒ with energy discrimination capabilities have been developed. When such detectors are operated under a high x-ray flux, however, coincident pulses distort the recorded energy spectrum. These distortions are called pulse pileup effects. It is essential to compensate for these effects on the recorded energy spectrum in order to take full advantage of spectral information PCXDs provide. Such compensation can be achieved by incorporating a pileup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
184
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
184
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another noise related factor affecting material decomposition is pulse pileup [33] which contributes negatively to the energy calibration. It has its origin in photon statistics and also depends on the read-out speed of the detector electronics [60,61]. Pileup occurs when two or more photons arrive within the same detector region and within the same integration time of the readout electronics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another noise related factor affecting material decomposition is pulse pileup [33] which contributes negatively to the energy calibration. It has its origin in photon statistics and also depends on the read-out speed of the detector electronics [60,61]. Pileup occurs when two or more photons arrive within the same detector region and within the same integration time of the readout electronics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One challenge is the high photon flux required in clinical scanning that exceeds the count rate capability of the current photon counting detectors. [12][13][14] It is widely expected that PCCT remains some years away from being clinically available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current PCDs are unable to cope with high x-ray flux used in conventional CT. Current PCDs are able to measure photon flux of up to 150 Mcps/mm 2 [30], whereas conventional x-ray tubes can produce up to 10 8 photons s À1 mm À2 [31]. The slow read-out of PCD causes pulse pile-ups and results to photons wrongly discriminated at the detector [32]. In addition, as PCD are mainly made out of CdTe, pulse splitting due to K-fluorescence from Cd (26.7 keV) or Te (37.8 keV) atoms will also contribute to wrongly discriminated photons.…”
Section: Energy Window Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 97%