2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6133-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical approach for crucial geometric errors identification of multi-axis machine tool based on global sensitivity analysis

Abstract: Geometric errors directly affect the tool tip position, reduce machining accuracy, and are one of the most important errors of multi-axis machining tool. However, the geometric errors are intercoupling, and the measured values at different points vary and are stochastic. The identification of the most crucial geometric errors and the determination of a method to control them is a key problem to improve the machining accuracy of machine tool. To achieve this goal, a new analytical method, to identify crucial ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding relationships between the basic geometric errors and accuracy parameters of the components (Cheng et al 2014) are listed in Table 17.…”
Section: Application and Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The corresponding relationships between the basic geometric errors and accuracy parameters of the components (Cheng et al 2014) are listed in Table 17.…”
Section: Application and Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, much research work has been done on modeling of multi-axis machine tools to find out the resultant error of individual components in relation to tool and work-piece point deviation (Bohez 2002a). And, the modeling methods of the geometric errors from different perspectives have experienced several developing phases (Cheng et al 2014). To describe the error of cutter location and tool orientation between the two kinematic chains, the error model is normally established using HTM (Liu et al 2011;Eman et al 1987;Lei and Hsu 2003), D-H (Jha and Kumar 2003), MD-H (Lin and Tzeng 2008), or Multi-body system (MBS) (Zhu et al 2012;Zhang et al 2003) theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, many studies have focused on modeling multi-axis machine tools to determine the resultant error of individual components in relation to the set-point deviation of the tool and the workpiece. Furthermore, the various methods for modeling the geometric errors from different perspectives have experienced a gradual development [7]. To describe the error of the cutter location and the tool orientation between the two kinematic chains, the error model is normally established using homogeneous transformation sciENcE aNd tEchNology matrices (HTM) [10,18,20], denavit-hartenberg (D-H) method [16], modified denavit-hartenberg (MD-H) method [19], or multi-body system (MBS) theory [31,32].…”
Section: Volumetric Error Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results of the local sensitivity analysis, they were able to slightly reduce the key error components, which made it easier to control the accuracy of the machine tool [6]. Cheng et al considered the stochastic characteristic of the geometric errors and employed Sobol's global sensitivity analysis method to identify the crucial geometric errors of a machine tool, which is helpful for improving the machining accuracy of multi-axis machine tools [7]. De-Lataliade et al developed a method based on Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) for estimating the reliability sensitivity [8].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%