Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on E-Commerce, E-Business and E-Government 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3108421.3108432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Student's Awareness to Using Internet of Things

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in much of the prior research (e.g. Gao and Bai, 2014; Alolayan, 2014; Patil, 2016; Saenphon, 2017), this study uses TAM to demonstrate that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness are significant predictors of user intention to (continue to) use a novel technology, thereby extending the applicability of the TAM framework to the context of pervasive computing involving smart objects. More importantly, this study adds to the literature by omitting the original TAM's attitude construct from the proposed model and establishing direct paths from perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness to usage intention, which validates the proposition of prior studies pointing to the limited role of attitude in shaping user acceptance of technology (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As in much of the prior research (e.g. Gao and Bai, 2014; Alolayan, 2014; Patil, 2016; Saenphon, 2017), this study uses TAM to demonstrate that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness are significant predictors of user intention to (continue to) use a novel technology, thereby extending the applicability of the TAM framework to the context of pervasive computing involving smart objects. More importantly, this study adds to the literature by omitting the original TAM's attitude construct from the proposed model and establishing direct paths from perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness to usage intention, which validates the proposition of prior studies pointing to the limited role of attitude in shaping user acceptance of technology (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Several technology adoption studies used the accessibility factor to measure the systems' effects on the attitude and usage intention (Karkonasasi, Yu-N, & Mousavi, 2018;Saenphon, 2017). As mentioned by Moore and Benbasat (1991), accessibility means the user's capability to access a system through a communication network or without being restricted by space or time.…”
Section: Accessibility (Ac)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned by Moore and Benbasat (1991), accessibility means the user's capability to access a system through a communication network or without being restricted by space or time. The definition same goes for Saenphon (2017), the accessibility refers to the degree of ease, which a user can access and use the system as an organizational factor.…”
Section: Accessibility (Ac)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study design is cross-sectional. A questionnaire was developed based on the technology acceptance model,[ 8 9 ] which models how users accept and use technology. Initially, the self-administered, semi-structured questionnaire consisted of 15 items [ Table 1 ] and later on after doing the reliability analysis, five items were removed as their removal improved the Cronbach's alpha, and the Cronbach's alpha was calculated again.…”
Section: Aterials and M Ethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%