2013
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/764/1/49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Accretion Model for the Anomalous X-Ray Pulsar 4u 0142+61

Abstract: We propose that the quiescent emission of AXPs/SGRs is powered by accretion from a fallback disk, requiring magnetic dipole fields in the range 10 12 − 10 13 G, and that the luminous hard tails of their X-ray spectra are produced by bulk-motion Comptonization in the radiative shock near the bottom of the accretion column. This radiation escapes as a fan beam, which is partly absorbed by the polar cap photosphere, heating it up to relatively high temperatures. The scattered component and the thermal emission fr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
67
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(80 reference statements)
9
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former possibility is ruled out because, for typical NS velocities and ISM densities, the resulting accretion rate is too small. Models invoking residual disks around isolated NSs are instead more plausible and represent the most widely discussed alternative to the magnetar interpretation [22,40,187]. In this class of models various mechanisms for the disk formation and different origins for the observed X-ray luminosity have been considered.…”
Section: Accretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former possibility is ruled out because, for typical NS velocities and ISM densities, the resulting accretion rate is too small. Models invoking residual disks around isolated NSs are instead more plausible and represent the most widely discussed alternative to the magnetar interpretation [22,40,187]. In this class of models various mechanisms for the disk formation and different origins for the observed X-ray luminosity have been considered.…”
Section: Accretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent failure of the traditional energy reservoir of pulsars in SGR/AXPs has led to different scenarios for the explanation of SGRs and AXPs, e.g. : magnetars (Duncan & Thompson 1992;Thompson & Duncan 1995); drift waves near the light-cylinder of NSs (see Malov 2010, and references therein); fallback accretion onto NSs (Trümper et al 2013); accretion Article number, page 1 of 11 arXiv:1612.01875v1 [astro-ph.HE] 6 Dec 2016 A&A proofs: manuscript no. SGRsAXPs onto exotic compact stars such as quark stars (Xu et al 2006); the quark-nova remnant model (Ouyed et al 2011); and massive, fast rotating, highly magnetized WDs (Malheiro et al 2012;Boshkayev et al 2013;Rueda et al 2013;Coelho & Malheiro 2014) None of the above scenarios appears to be ruled out by the current observational data, thus further scrutiny of the nature and the possible energy reservoir of SGRs and AXPs deserves still attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These spectra consist of two components (e.g., den Hartog et al 2008a,b;Enoto et al 2010); a quasi-thermal component at low energies, which is generally attributed to the photospheric emission from the neutron star polar cap, and a hard power-law component. In the model of Trümper et al (2010Trümper et al ( , 2013, this power-law component is attributed to the emission from the radiative shock, located near the bottom of the accretion column. This component is emitted as a fan beam, which partly hits the surrounding polar cap, where the radiation is absorbed or scattered, leading to the quasi-thermal component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%