2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2017.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An a posteriori error estimator for a LPS method for Navier–Stokes equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The error analysis of upper and lower bounds avoids the use of saturation assumption. Although the construction of auxiliary space needs a transformation operator in the reference element, it provides a novel idea for removing saturation assumption in reliability analysis [2,3,4,5]. Hakula et al constructed the auxiliary space directly on each element for the second order elliptic problem and elliptic eigenvalue problem and proved that the error is bounded by the error estimator up to oscillation terms without the saturation assumption [17,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error analysis of upper and lower bounds avoids the use of saturation assumption. Although the construction of auxiliary space needs a transformation operator in the reference element, it provides a novel idea for removing saturation assumption in reliability analysis [2,3,4,5]. Hakula et al constructed the auxiliary space directly on each element for the second order elliptic problem and elliptic eigenvalue problem and proved that the error is bounded by the error estimator up to oscillation terms without the saturation assumption [17,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%