Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd000969
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Amphotericin B lipid soluble formulations versus amphotericin B in cancer patients with neutropenia

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
50
8
7
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
2

Year Published

Range
2000
2000
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
48
8
4

Relationship

5
55

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 60 publications

(50 citation statements)
references

References 36 publications

2
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…28 These new antifungal drugs have not yet been compared with CCAB, only with c-AmB. 1,11,12,29,30 Our results are in line with other studies investigating CCAB, which showed that renal dysfunction was mild and reversible. In these reports, several patient groups were studied, including ICU patients.…”
Section: Geersing Et Al
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, no studies demonstrate superior efficacy or mortality reduction of other antifungal treatments like the newer azoles or echinocandins over CCAB. 1,2,19,31,39 Based on our findings and the above-mentioned considerations, CCAB should be considered as a safe, first-line antifungal in critically ill patients with suspected or documented invasive candidiasis pending confirmation or exclusion of diagnosis and identification of the organism. 31 A strength of our findings is that all results support the same conclusion.…”
Section: Geersing Et Al
mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation