2021
DOI: 10.1002/app.51578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphiphilic copolymers of dimethyl aminoethyl methacrylate and methyl methacrylate with controlled hydrophilicity for antialgal activity

Abstract: Biofouling due to algae mass attachment has detrimental effects on the performance and economy of many manufacturing processes. In consideration of this, present research is focused to mitigate such effect through the development of environmentally benign active antialgal cationic amphiphilic copolymers of poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA) and methyl methacrylate (MMA). The copolymers compositions were synthesized to tailor various characteristics to control surface biofilm formation and anti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the rate constant values k1 are very small in each polymer that indicates low adsorption possibility on the polymers. It is due to the antifouling behavior of these polymers as indicated in our previous studies [17,18,29]. These results are in accordance with the zeta potential values.…”
Section: Kinetic Studies and Adsorption Modellingsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, the rate constant values k1 are very small in each polymer that indicates low adsorption possibility on the polymers. It is due to the antifouling behavior of these polymers as indicated in our previous studies [17,18,29]. These results are in accordance with the zeta potential values.…”
Section: Kinetic Studies and Adsorption Modellingsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, the rate constant values k1 are very small in each polymer that indicates low adsorption possibility on the polymers. It is due to the antifouling behavior of these polymers as indicated in our previous studies 28 , 30 , 35 . These results are in accordance with the zeta potential values at pH 7.4 the BSA has a low negative charge as well as p MD1, p MD2, p MS1 and p MS2 also have a negative charge that causes repulsion to the incoming BSA molecules and results in low adsorption on the polymer surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The determination of the apparent surface energy was achieved through the utilization of various methods, including the application of the equilibrium contact angle and the Chibowski Equation (9) that illustrate the correlation between surface energy and the reduction in contact angle 44 . Greater hydrophilicity of material as a result of increase in polyanion concentration enhanced the hydration shell of water on the surface 45 γSgoodbreak=γl2)(1goodbreak+cosθEq$$ {\gamma}_S=\frac{\gamma_l}{2}\left(1+{cos\theta}_{Eq}\right) $$ …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 Greater hydrophilicity of material as a result of increase in polyanion concentration enhanced the hydration shell of water on the surface. 45 γ…”
Section: Surface Energy and Hydropilicitymentioning
confidence: 99%