2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amperometric l-glutamate biosensor based on bacterial cell-surface displayed glutamate dehydrogenase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as measurements are made in the gas phase, interfering species must also be volatilisable and be able to traverse the membrane. To compare the current device with other electrochemical sensors, its response to the presence of a number of common potential interferents was evaluated at typical concentrations [16][17][18][19][20]. Acetaminophen (600 µM) and ascorbic acid (100 µM) were assessed, along with related nitrogenous and ammoniacal compounds such as creatinine (45 µM), glutamic acid (100 µM) and uric acid (500 µM), and compared with impedimetric responses in PBS and 30 µM ammonia.…”
Section: Interference Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as measurements are made in the gas phase, interfering species must also be volatilisable and be able to traverse the membrane. To compare the current device with other electrochemical sensors, its response to the presence of a number of common potential interferents was evaluated at typical concentrations [16][17][18][19][20]. Acetaminophen (600 µM) and ascorbic acid (100 µM) were assessed, along with related nitrogenous and ammoniacal compounds such as creatinine (45 µM), glutamic acid (100 µM) and uric acid (500 µM), and compared with impedimetric responses in PBS and 30 µM ammonia.…”
Section: Interference Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison of figure of merits of our system with previous reports is shown in Table . This biosensor has a detection limit (1.2 µM) at the same concentration as previous reports that modified CNT with another material, such as with CHIT‐CNT‐AuNP , CNT‐CHIT‐MB , Nafion‐bacteria‐PEI‐CNT . However, this biosensor demonstrated a wider linearity with four orders of magnitude (5 µM–20 mM) compared to the single CNT modification (two to three orders).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two types of GDH enzymes and they require either nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) or nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP) as a coenzyme for their enzymatic activity. Glutamate sensors using separately NAD‐dependent GDH (GDH NAD ) and NADP‐dependent GDH (GDH NAD ) have previously been reported . It should be possible to determine glutamate levels from the anodic oxidation current of NADH and NADPH generated by the enzymatic reaction of GDH.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be possible to determine glutamate levels from the anodic oxidation current of NADH and NADPH generated by the enzymatic reaction of GDH. NADH and NADPH require a high electrical potential for electrolytic oxidation and thus carbon nanotube (CNT) have been used to improve the oxidation capacity of electrodes . The use of CNT‐modified electrodes provides high current response at lower potential compared to other electrode types.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%