2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amino acid recovery does not prevent susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae in nitrate reductase double-deficient Arabidopsis thaliana plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 1, control non-inoculated nia1 nia2 leaves displayed lower basal NO emission than WT leaves, which confirms the deficient NO production by this mutant (Modolo et al, 2005Oliveira et al, 2009). When plants inoculated with the avr strain of Psm were analyzed, there was a significant increase in NO emission by WT leaves, from 36.4 ± 9.1 to 102.3 ± 7.2 pmol.min -1 .g FW -1 .…”
Section: Tropical Plant Pathology 35 (2) March -April 2010supporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure 1, control non-inoculated nia1 nia2 leaves displayed lower basal NO emission than WT leaves, which confirms the deficient NO production by this mutant (Modolo et al, 2005Oliveira et al, 2009). When plants inoculated with the avr strain of Psm were analyzed, there was a significant increase in NO emission by WT leaves, from 36.4 ± 9.1 to 102.3 ± 7.2 pmol.min -1 .g FW -1 .…”
Section: Tropical Plant Pathology 35 (2) March -April 2010supporting
confidence: 55%
“…After 48 h, bacteria were diluted to the desired concentration and inoculated into the abaxial surface of A. thaliana leaves using a syringe without a needle. Thirtyto forty-day-old WT and nia1 nia2 plants of Arabidopsis thaliana L. ecotype Columbia-0, cultivated as described by Oliveira et al (2009), were used for the experiments.…”
Section: Tropical Plant Pathology 35 (2) March -April 2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the discovery that plant NR could produce NO both under in vitro and in vivo conditions (Harper, 1981), a great deal of evidence has indicated this enzyme as one of the major plant biosynthetic sources of NO (Rockel et al, 2002; Meyer et al, 2005; Kaiser et al, 2010). Supporting this view, pharmacological and genetic approaches in different plant species, organs, tissues, and experimental conditions have revealed that NR inhibition frequently results in decreased NO production (Planchet and Kaiser, 2006; Oliveira et al, 2009; Freschi et al, 2010; Kolbert et al, 2010; Lombardo and Lamattina, 2012). On the other hand, the existence of NOS-like activity in plants is exclusively supported by biochemical and pharmacological evidence since a canonical NOS gene or a mutant deficient in NOS-like-dependent NO production has not been identified in higher plants yet (Corpas et al, 2006; Gupta et al, 2011; Mur et al, 2012a).…”
Section: No Production and Removal: Why So Many Pathways In Plants?mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Interestingly, the contribution of several of these proteins to plant defence has been highlighted recently. Arabidopsis mutants affected in different steps of N transport and assimilation, such as the nitrate reductase (NR) double mutant (nia1 nia2) (Modolo et al, 2006;Oliveira et al, 2009), the high-affinity nitrate transporter NRT2.1 mutant (Camañes et al, 2012) and the putative nitrate transporter NRT2.6 (Dechorgnat et al, 2012) mutant, were all found to display an altered sensitivity to pathogens. Conversely, pathogens modulate the expression of genes or the activity of enzymes involved in N transport, N assimilation, N remobilisation and amino acid metabolism (Fagard et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%