2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambient volatile organic compounds in tropical environments: Potential sources, composition and impacts – A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because plant leaves are directly exposed to the air, air pollution directly changes the physiological characteristics of plant leaves, such as the structure of the epidermis . Some airborne pollutants (e.g., toluene) can be used as carbon sources by some interstate microorganisms, thus changing the structural composition of the community …”
Section: Drivers Of Phyllosphere Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because plant leaves are directly exposed to the air, air pollution directly changes the physiological characteristics of plant leaves, such as the structure of the epidermis . Some airborne pollutants (e.g., toluene) can be used as carbon sources by some interstate microorganisms, thus changing the structural composition of the community …”
Section: Drivers Of Phyllosphere Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the potential effects of VOCs on the generation of O3 and SOA, the OFPs and SOAFPs were calculated and analyzed in this study. The OFP represents the potential maximum contribution of specific VOC species to O3 generation under the optimal reaction conditions, and is widely used to evaluate the role of VOCs in the formation of O3 (Hanif et al, 2021;Liang et al, 2020;Mitchell et al, 2021). In this study, to identify the OFP of each species of VOCs, the maximum incremental reactivity (MIR) method (Carter, 1994) is used.…”
Section: Photochemical Activity Analysis Of Vocsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Piasecki and Kostyrko [93] developed a method based on a decision matrix that includes six attributes: actual indoor air CO 2 concentration, TVOCs, and formaldehyde concentration, and their anthropogenic and construction product emissions to the indoor environment with a combined weighting scheme for an IAQ index equation. Kim et al [94] suggested an IAQ index which reflects PM 2.5 and CO 2 , divided into five grades from "good" to "hazardous" with a scale of 1 to 100 points, as follows: "good" (0-20); "moderate" (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40); "unhealthy for a sensitive group" (41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60), "bad" (61-80), and "hazardous" (81)(82)(83)…”
Section: Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, as people spend most of their time inside buildings, mainly at home or at the workplace [38], researchers started to change the focus from outdoor air quality (OAQ) [39] to IAQ. According to Hanif et al [40], VOCs are widely recognized to cause significant adverse health effects on humans. Huang et al [41] have concluded that VOCs concentration indoor may become at least ten times higher than outdoor.…”
Section: Vocsmentioning
confidence: 99%