2018
DOI: 10.1177/0021886318812122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambidexterity as Historically Embedded Process: Evidence From NASA, 1958 to 2016

Abstract: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent years have seen an influx of new findings associated with how this is possible through IT Governance redesign (Chi et al, 2017;Gregory et al, 2018Gregory et al, , 2015Mithas & Rust, 2016). Yet, critique still prevails that ambidexterity is studied in an overly acontextual, configuration-driven approach (Heracleous et al, 2019;Raisch & Birkinshaw, 2008;Simsek et al, 2009). Core to more recent contributions within the field of organisational ambidexterity (Heracleous et al, 2019;Luger et al, 2018;Zimmermann et al, 2018) is the disbanding of a static perspective to ambidexterity (i.e., balance) towards a process-oriented perspective (i.e., balancing), studied through a focus on enactment.…”
Section: Theoretical Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent years have seen an influx of new findings associated with how this is possible through IT Governance redesign (Chi et al, 2017;Gregory et al, 2018Gregory et al, , 2015Mithas & Rust, 2016). Yet, critique still prevails that ambidexterity is studied in an overly acontextual, configuration-driven approach (Heracleous et al, 2019;Raisch & Birkinshaw, 2008;Simsek et al, 2009). Core to more recent contributions within the field of organisational ambidexterity (Heracleous et al, 2019;Luger et al, 2018;Zimmermann et al, 2018) is the disbanding of a static perspective to ambidexterity (i.e., balance) towards a process-oriented perspective (i.e., balancing), studied through a focus on enactment.…”
Section: Theoretical Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was cited in corporations such as SoftBank of Japan, a company that has achieved business innovation worldwide and has acquired knowledge about organizational adaptability that drives strategic innovation [54]. The study was also noted in work presented by a study done by NASA that reveals organizational dexterity as a process contingent on the route taken, instead of something attainable through generic applications of models of structural, temporal or ambidexterity models contextual [55].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heracleous has also conducted in-depth case research at the Johnson Space Center at NASA on organization change, culture, and ambidexterity (Heracleous et al, 2019c;Heracleous & Gonzalez, 2014;Terrier et al, 2017). This research investigates how an established paradigm of a venerable organization in the public sector can change in response to environmental pressures in a way that does not disrupt its current programs and balances a variety of stakeholder objectives.…”
Section: Key Contributions: Organization Change Discourse Theory Anmentioning
confidence: 99%