1952
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1952.01530290099014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amalgam Tattoo (Localized Argyria)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1953
1953
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amalgam tattoo ( Figure 4 ) is probably the most common form of LA [ 91 , 92 , 93 ]. It is is a common and easily recognizable entity that results from the impregnation of silver-contained dental amalgam into oral mucosa following tooth restoration procedures [ 92 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ]. A flat, dark-blue mucosal lesion near a restored tooth is highly indicative of an amalgam tattoo, with size varying from small, millimetric lesions to larger ones, with a minority of these even exhibiting radiopacity and potentially triggering a foreign body reaction [ 92 , 95 ].…”
Section: Argyria Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amalgam tattoo ( Figure 4 ) is probably the most common form of LA [ 91 , 92 , 93 ]. It is is a common and easily recognizable entity that results from the impregnation of silver-contained dental amalgam into oral mucosa following tooth restoration procedures [ 92 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ]. A flat, dark-blue mucosal lesion near a restored tooth is highly indicative of an amalgam tattoo, with size varying from small, millimetric lesions to larger ones, with a minority of these even exhibiting radiopacity and potentially triggering a foreign body reaction [ 92 , 95 ].…”
Section: Argyria Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The pigmented areas vary from very small spots to large areas that can extend over multiple teeth and cause serious esthetic problems. Despite awareness about this phenomenon for many years, 10 treatment methods are yet to be established, because of difficulties associated with treatment procedures and the lack of suitable instruments. Previous case studies' findings have shown that surgical treatments to remove pigmented gingiva, namely, connective tissue grafts (CTGs) [11][12][13] and free gingival grafts (FGGs), 14 are invasive, complicated, and not always effective at removing tattoos, and these procedures are associated with risks, including postsurgical gingival recession and defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%