2011
DOI: 10.2478/v10102-011-0018-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative methods in toxicology: pre-validated and validated methods

Abstract: The development of alternative methods to animal experimentation has progressed rapidly over the last 20 years. Today, in vitro and in silico methods have an important role in the hazard identification and assessment of toxicology profile of compounds. Advanced alternative methods and their combinations are also used for safety assessment of final products. Several alternative methods, which were scientifically validated and accepted by competent regulatory bodies, can be used for regulatory toxicology purpose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, most of these tests were never validated. Meanwhile, validation is an indispensable requirement for any new test system, not the least as to warrant regulatory acceptance and the necessary legal certainty (Balls 1995;Garthoff 1995;Kandárová and Letašiová 2011). Nevertheless, the choice of commonly accepted standards for validation remains a problem.…”
Section: Acceptance and Validation Of Alternative Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, most of these tests were never validated. Meanwhile, validation is an indispensable requirement for any new test system, not the least as to warrant regulatory acceptance and the necessary legal certainty (Balls 1995;Garthoff 1995;Kandárová and Letašiová 2011). Nevertheless, the choice of commonly accepted standards for validation remains a problem.…”
Section: Acceptance and Validation Of Alternative Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…OECD TG 405,420,423,425,436 and 443). However, some of the implemented test guidelines, including cellular assays, actually do replace animal experiments (Kandárová and Letašiová 2011;Liebsch et al 2011). They can be subdivided into three main categories:…”
Section: Status Quomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, safety testing plays a strong role, but also scientists and organizations interested in efficacy testing and broad biomedical research are involved. With all the past success of 3Rs in the field of safety testing (Kandarova and Letasiova, 2011;Bouvier d'Yvoire et al, 2012;Leist et al, 2012a) it is important that the experience gained there is leveraged to the basic research and R&D field. Over nine million animals are used there per year, and very few coordinated research activities are ongoing to reduce this number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu in vivo testler bahsedildiği gibi hayvan refahı ve etiksel açıdan pek çok sorun teşkil etmektedir. Hayvan kullanılmayan fototoksisite testleri bu sorunların üstesinden gelmek açısından oldukça önem taşımaktadır (40,41). …”
Section: In Vivo Fototoksisite Testleriunclassified