2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative bearing materials for intervertebral disc arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
45
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
45
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of self-mating PEEK was evaluated previously as an alternative bearing material in comparison to conventional UHMWPE on metal and other self-mating polymer combinations in the form of the Active C device [31]. The testing methodology utilized the load and motion profiles of the ISO standard at a test frequency of 1 Hz in a lubricant of 30 g/L bovine serum with the addition of 20 mM of EDTA and amphotericin to retard bacterial degradation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of self-mating PEEK was evaluated previously as an alternative bearing material in comparison to conventional UHMWPE on metal and other self-mating polymer combinations in the form of the Active C device [31]. The testing methodology utilized the load and motion profiles of the ISO standard at a test frequency of 1 Hz in a lubricant of 30 g/L bovine serum with the addition of 20 mM of EDTA and amphotericin to retard bacterial degradation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 However, cell-mediated hypersensitivity reactions (Type IV) have been well reported after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and have become an increasing concern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the recent literature, the wear rate of PEEK self-mating cervical disc arthroplasty is reported as 1.4 ± 0.4 mg per million cycles; the historical cervical disc control (i.e. UHMWPE against CoCrMo) has a wear rate of 1.0 ± 0.4 mg per million cycles [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are plenty of studies [32][33][34] that report on the biocompatibility of PEEK wear debris, however none focus on wear debris generated in cervical TDA. A recent in-vitro wear study pointed out that the wear particle size distribution of a PEEK-on-PEEK cervical disc was from 0.23 to 0.51 m with a mean roundness of 0.5 [30]. A more targeted host tissue response study is demanded to further ascertain the biocompatibility of PEEK wear debris generated from cervical total disc replacement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%