2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered prefrontal cortex activity during working memory task in Bipolar Disorder: A functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study in euthymic bipolar I and II patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study offers a better characterization of the differences between the two main bipolar subgroups currently defined by DSM-5 60 in terms of clinical and sociodemographic features analyzed in an Italian sample. As recent genetic, epigenetic, and imaging studies have already shown specific differences in BDI vs II patients, [61][62][63] our findings provide further clinical support to the notion that BDI and BDII categories may be characterized by distinct profiles, rather than being simply considered two different expressions, in terms of severity, of the same entity. As such a perspective may have relevant repercussions on patients' prognosis and outcome, a better understanding of the differential characteristics of these phenotypic subtypes (ie, distinct phenotypes may be present within bipolar I and II subtypes and differentiated on the basis of specific features) may contribute to obtain more tailored pharmacological and psychosocial interventions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The present study offers a better characterization of the differences between the two main bipolar subgroups currently defined by DSM-5 60 in terms of clinical and sociodemographic features analyzed in an Italian sample. As recent genetic, epigenetic, and imaging studies have already shown specific differences in BDI vs II patients, [61][62][63] our findings provide further clinical support to the notion that BDI and BDII categories may be characterized by distinct profiles, rather than being simply considered two different expressions, in terms of severity, of the same entity. As such a perspective may have relevant repercussions on patients' prognosis and outcome, a better understanding of the differential characteristics of these phenotypic subtypes (ie, distinct phenotypes may be present within bipolar I and II subtypes and differentiated on the basis of specific features) may contribute to obtain more tailored pharmacological and psychosocial interventions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore, we have speculated that the changes in this neural circuit may be related to the pathophysiology of BD in females during adolescence and young adulthood. Additional support for our speculation has been shown in offspring (mean age = 13.8 years) of parents with BD who exhibit altered amygdala-PFC responses to facial emotion [ 19 ]. However, our results did not show any change in rs FC from the amygdala to the PFC in female patients with BD aged 26 to 45.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…It is now well established that cognitive impairment is one of the core features of mood disorders, emerging during depressive episodes in major depressive disorder (MDD) and during depressive and manic phases in bipolar disorder (BD). Moreover, there is evidence for the persistence of cognitive impairment beyond mood episodes during euthymia (Dell'Osso et al, 2015). A number of clinical characteristics has been associated with cognitive impairment in mood disorders and the severity of the impairment has been related to several clinical factors (McIntyre et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%