1975
Alteration of hypertrophic scars induced by mechanical pressure
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
45
8
3
0
Citation Types
1
29
0
3
Year Published
1977
2022
Publication Types
Select...
48
4
3
Relationship
0
55
Authors
Journals
Cited by 55 publications
(33 citation statements)
References 0 publications
1
29
0
3
“…The disorganized orientation was replaced under pressure by a parallel arrangement similar to the pattern observed in normotrophic healing. This pressure-induced collagen reorganization has been observed previously by Kischer et al 11 In areas treated with pressure, there was a disappearance of nodular pattern. Furthermore, we observed that in hypertrophic scars, collagen fibers perpendicular to the epidermis were anchored in dermal-epidermal zone and probably participated in the impaired mechanical properties of the scar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The disorganized orientation was replaced under pressure by a parallel arrangement similar to the pattern observed in normotrophic healing. This pressure-induced collagen reorganization has been observed previously by Kischer et al 11 In areas treated with pressure, there was a disappearance of nodular pattern. Furthermore, we observed that in hypertrophic scars, collagen fibers perpendicular to the epidermis were anchored in dermal-epidermal zone and probably participated in the impaired mechanical properties of the scar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Using quantitative techniques, we also found an increased sulfated GAG content at 15 days PW, but a decreased sulfated GAG content in the later stages of scar formation. The latter finding indicates a faster maturation of the scar tissue (Kischer et al, 1975;Shetlar et al, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One action may be to provide primary closure of the removal site with sutures or to use pressure garments to inhibit excess proliferation of fibroblasts, protect against irritation, and reduce the scar size as with skin lesions. 20,33,34 Although miniscrew failure per se did not increase the risk of scarring, our study was cross-sectional, and the course of initial healing was not evaluated. Since infection and persistent inflammation after removal the natural course of healing after miniscrew removal and factors influencing initial healing should be further evaluated in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
