1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00354635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allozymic and morphometric evidence for two stocks of the European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus in Adriatic waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
83
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
83
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2a), as a result of mechanisms that limit the gene exchange between the Adriatic and the other Mediterranean populations. According to Astraldi et al (1999) the Adriatic Sea is a semi-closed area with peculiar oceanographic characteristics, which seem to influence the distribution of allelic frequencies in other fish species, like the European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus (Bembo et al, 1996) and the common sole Solea vulgaris (Kotoulas et al, 1995), in which genetic differences were found. Nevertheless, the intraspecific genetic substructure of D. vulgaris, was supported by the significant heterogeneity among each pair of samples (as calculated by the pairwise Fisher's exact test) (data not showed), showing the heterogeneity in all the samples analysed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a), as a result of mechanisms that limit the gene exchange between the Adriatic and the other Mediterranean populations. According to Astraldi et al (1999) the Adriatic Sea is a semi-closed area with peculiar oceanographic characteristics, which seem to influence the distribution of allelic frequencies in other fish species, like the European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus (Bembo et al, 1996) and the common sole Solea vulgaris (Kotoulas et al, 1995), in which genetic differences were found. Nevertheless, the intraspecific genetic substructure of D. vulgaris, was supported by the significant heterogeneity among each pair of samples (as calculated by the pairwise Fisher's exact test) (data not showed), showing the heterogeneity in all the samples analysed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphometric and genetic techniques have been applied to the problem of stock definition and identification of anchovy (Bembo et al, 1995;Bembo et al, 1996aBembo et al, , 1996bPla et al, 1996;Tudela, 1999;Tudela et al, 1999), hake (Roldán et al, 1998), Norway lobster (Castro et al, 1998;Maltagliati et al, 1998) and red shrimp (Sardà et al, 1998), but the impact of these studies have been weak because they were not conclusive.…”
Section: Stocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods are used for identification but phenotype based on morphometric and meristic is considered as earliest and authentic methods for the identification of fish species in fish biology to measure discreteness and relationships among various taxonomic categories. There are many well documented morphometric studies which provide evidence for stock discreteness (Avsar, 1994;Haddon and Willis, 1995;Bembo et al, 1996;Anene, 1999;Turan, 1999;Zafar et al, 2002;Barriga-Sosa et al, 2004;Doherty and McCarthy, 2004;Naesje et al, 2004). Morphometric is the external measurements of an organism, while meristic counts means serial counts of body elements (Talwar and Jhingran, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%