2010
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2010.523847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allowable sampling period for consensus control of multiple general linear dynamical agents in random networks

Abstract: This article studies the consensus problem for a group of sampled-data general linear dynamical agents over random communication networks. Dynamic output feedback protocols are applied to solve the consensus problem. When the sampling period is sufficiently small, it is shown that as long as the mean topology has globally reachable nodes, the mean square consensus can be achieved by selecting protocol parameters so that n À 1 specified subsystems are simultaneously stabilised. However, when the sampling period… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the first-order and secondorder integrator target tracking systems, in which for any large but bounded sensing period there always exist proper linear state feedback consensus tracking protocols driving the vehicles to successfully track the target, the allowable sensing period for the feasibility of tracking general linear dynamical target should be bounded. When the sensing period is too large, the tracking problem may be unsolvable [19].…”
Section: Consensus Tracking With Constant Sensing Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike the first-order and secondorder integrator target tracking systems, in which for any large but bounded sensing period there always exist proper linear state feedback consensus tracking protocols driving the vehicles to successfully track the target, the allowable sensing period for the feasibility of tracking general linear dynamical target should be bounded. When the sensing period is too large, the tracking problem may be unsolvable [19].…”
Section: Consensus Tracking With Constant Sensing Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Katayama [18] considered sampled-data consensus control for nonlinear multi-agent systems of strict-feedback form. Based on the hybrid system analysis, Zhang and Tian [19] studied general linear sampled-data multi-agent systems and gave an allowable upper bound of sampling period for system under given protocols. By converting the sampled-data system to the discrete-time system with delays, Gao and Wang [20] studied the consensus of second-order multi-agent systems where the sampling period of each agent was independent of the others' and the topology was varying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [7] further studied the SDLLCP for double-integrator multi-agent systems based on the impulsive control strategy. In [29], [31], the sampleddata leaderless mean square consensus problem was studied for the general linear multi-agent systems with packet losses. Reference [30] studied the SDLLCP for general linear multiagent systems with switching topologies using the input delay method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, inherent nonlinear dynamics of sampled-data consensus problems were investigated in [15]. It is well known that, most current investigate about sampled-data consensus problems are applying discrete-time approach [7][8][9][10][11][16][17] and input delay approach [12,15]. We can find that the exponential uncertainties of linear discrete-time models, which are drawn into by time-varying sampling intervals, it is hard to analyze the dynamic systems when the time delays are larger than sampling periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%