2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allometric models for improving aboveground biomass estimates in West African savanna ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…WD is determined from wood samples in laboratory as a ratio of dry mass to the green volume [31]. Literatures [32][33][34][35][36][37] list these variables according to their importance as dbh, WD, and ht in explaining tree biomass variations and dbh and ht for tree volume [32][33][34][35][36][37]. Among the three explanatory variables, tree dbh and ht have been often used as only explanatory variables to develop biomass allometric models [31].…”
Section: Of 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WD is determined from wood samples in laboratory as a ratio of dry mass to the green volume [31]. Literatures [32][33][34][35][36][37] list these variables according to their importance as dbh, WD, and ht in explaining tree biomass variations and dbh and ht for tree volume [32][33][34][35][36][37]. Among the three explanatory variables, tree dbh and ht have been often used as only explanatory variables to develop biomass allometric models [31].…”
Section: Of 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although allometric models exist for Africa [35,36,37] , these are generally limited in their applications by the dbh range used for the model calibration, uneven distribution of the dbh within the dbh range, the type and number of tree species used in developing the models, ecological zones, and the type and number of explanatory variables used [38]. Due to lack of local allometric models for some sub-Saharan African countries rely on pantropic models such as the ones developed by [30] for the estimation of local AGB and BGB.…”
Section: Of 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, the canopy area based on the SfM method would be more accurate than that assuming an elliptical shape because of the distorted shape of the canopy (Figure 6). Although DBH has often been used to estimate biomass in forestry, the development of LiDAR observations has increased the opportunity to use the canopy area as an alternative parameter [33,34]. The canopy area is also an important parameter influencing carbon gain in relation to leaf photosynthesis, total leaf area, and leaf lifespan [34,35].…”
Section: Three-dimensional Tree Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although DBH has often been used to estimate biomass in forestry, the development of LiDAR observations has increased the opportunity to use the canopy area as an alternative parameter [33,34]. The canopy area is also an important parameter influencing carbon gain in relation to leaf photosynthesis, total leaf area, and leaf lifespan [34,35].…”
Section: Three-dimensional Tree Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for most savanna woody plants, BGB does not necessarily match AGB [18], making hypothetic the use of simple allometric relationships implying only the stem size or a standard value of root-shoot biomass ratio for predicting BGB. Yet, in Africa, where the natural environment is mostly consists in natural savannas [19], allometric equations are systematically used to estimate both AGB and BGB of savanna trees [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. This contributes certainly to the uncertainties in the carbon balance in Africa, which still remain high [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%