2008
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.144.6.814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allergic Contact Dermatitis After Postsurgical Repair With 2-Octylcyanoacrylate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are reports about allergic reactions to 2-octyl cyanoacrylate [14], hardly any adverse effects about the Prineo TM wound closure system have been published so far [15]. In our series of 224 procedures in 180 patients, local allergic reactions to the Prineo TM wound closure system were encountered in 4 patients (1.8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Although there are reports about allergic reactions to 2-octyl cyanoacrylate [14], hardly any adverse effects about the Prineo TM wound closure system have been published so far [15]. In our series of 224 procedures in 180 patients, local allergic reactions to the Prineo TM wound closure system were encountered in 4 patients (1.8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Despite the widespread use of 2‐octyl‐cyanoacrylates, only a relatively low rate of sensitization has been reported. This could be because of the rapid polymerization of the cyano group upon contact with keratin (3, 4). Others have speculated that the haptens may be enclosed by keratinocytes, making it more difficult for them to trigger an immune response (1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Known risks of the adhesive such as skin reactions remain generally minor and were explained to the patient. These rare side effects include reports of contact dermatitis and localized foreign body reactions [13][14][15]. All catheters were placed in the operating room using standard sterile technique in the internal jugular or subclavian vein.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%