2007
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.24.002474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alignment methods for biased multicanonical sampling

Abstract: The efficiency of the multicanonical procedure can be significantly improved by applying an additional bias to the numerically generated sample space. However, results obtained by biasing in different sampling regions cannot in general be accurately combined, since their relative normalization coefficient is not known precisely. We demonstrate that for overlapping biasing regions a simple iterative procedure can be employed to determine the required coefficients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 and the terminating position of each curve is distinguished by a row of markers. Clearly, each partial result closely approximates the final density of states curve in overlapping regions in analogy to [41] (it should be also be noted that this technique can also be applied to determine the density of states up to a normalizing constant within any limited region of energy). The associated canonical entropy at each inverse temperature is calculated and displayed in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…11 and the terminating position of each curve is distinguished by a row of markers. Clearly, each partial result closely approximates the final density of states curve in overlapping regions in analogy to [41] (it should be also be noted that this technique can also be applied to determine the density of states up to a normalizing constant within any limited region of energy). The associated canonical entropy at each inverse temperature is calculated and displayed in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…While microcanonical and quasi-microcanonical calculations of the specific heat are intrinsically less accurate than those employing the canonical procedure, in other non-statistical mechanics contexts microcanonical methods can prove advantageous. [39] In Figure 7 the result of a typical microcanonical calculation in which the unnormalized value of microcanonical E is first lowered from 0 to 2056  (lower solid curve) is compared to that of a similar calculation in which microcanonical E is instead raised from 2056  to 0 (upper solid curve) and to the exact result [40] (dashed curve). The error of the two curves, which is smaller when the initial state is magnetized, is systematic but can be reduced by accumulating the transition matrix elements from both of the calculations.…”
Section: E mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…steps for each realization [37]. [38][35] These results clearly indicate that the precision of the adaptive method exceeds that of standard procedures for an equivalent number of realizations.While microcanonical and quasi-microcanonical calculations of the specific heat are intrinsically less accurate than those employing the canonical procedure, in other non-statistical mechanics contexts microcanonical methods can prove advantageous [39]. InFigure 7the result of a typical microcanonical calculation in which the unnormalized value of microcanonical E is first lowered from 0 to 2056  (lower solid curve) is compared to that of a similar calculation in which microcanonical E is instead raised from 2056  to 0 (upper solid curve) and to the exact result…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time variable is a shifted time coordinate, , where is the real-time coordinate and is the group velocity. is the saturation power (3) where is the photon energy, is the effective cross section area of the active region, and is the differential modal gain. We model the gain by a linear function of the carrier density , i.e., with the carrier density at transparency.…”
Section: Soa Output Power Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An excellent review is given by Berg in [2]. The main advantage of the MMC method is that it allows calculation of extremely low pdf values as for example down to [3]. Such low values cannot be reached by unbiased Monte Carlo simulations within practical time limits, and it may even be difficult to derive the pdf from an analytic expression by double precision computation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%