2017
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6yh62
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithmic Accountability

Abstract: Accountability is fundamentally about checks and balances to power. In theory, both government and corporations are kept accountable through social, economic, and political mechanisms. Journalism and public advocates serve as an additional tool to hold powerful institutions and individuals accountable. But in a world of data and algorithms, accountability is often murky. Beyond questions about whether the market is sufficient or governmental regulation is necessary, how should algorithms be held accountable? F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, there have been numerous works over the past decades which touch upon the theme of algorithmic accountability, albeit using different terms and stemming from different disciplines [e.g. 83,88,94,116,123]. Thus, while the term may be new, the theme certainly stands in a much older tradition of, for instance, computational accountability [e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there have been numerous works over the past decades which touch upon the theme of algorithmic accountability, albeit using different terms and stemming from different disciplines [e.g. 83,88,94,116,123]. Thus, while the term may be new, the theme certainly stands in a much older tradition of, for instance, computational accountability [e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our findings, we recommend that the work of AI ethics needs to be recognized, legitimized, and rewarded. While it is critical to hold the designers of ethically problematic AI‐based systems accountable (Rosenblat et al, 2014), it is also critical to proactively encourage and reward ethically exemplary work (Huff & Barnard, 2009). Thus, we argue that teams developing new AI‐based systems need to include core team members who are trained to consider the ethical, legal, and societal implications of those systems, and who also have the technical expertise to formulate actionable design recommendations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, record subjects are often left carrying the burden of correction on a case-by-case basis when confronted with the effects of exclusionary policies. In these ways, inaccurate criminal records and the challenges of rectification underscore the unequal effects of data-driven systems that are pervasive, invasive, and opaque (Madden et al., 2017; Rosenblat et al., 2014). Crucially, as Benjamin (2019) observes, when “glitches” in these technologies accumulate in racially patterned ways, they force us to consider whether apparent aberrations are “not spurious, but rather a kind of signal of how the system operates” (80).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%