2013
DOI: 10.4204/eptcs.120.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebraic Meta-Theory of Processes with Data

Abstract: There exists a rich literature of rule formats guaranteeing different algebraic properties for formalisms with a Structural Operational Semantics. Moreover, there exist a few approaches for automatically deriving axiomatizations characterizing strong bisimilarity of processes. To our knowledge, this literature has never been extended to the setting with data (e.g. to model storage and memory). We show how the rule formats for algebraic properties can be exploited in a generic manner in the setting with data. M… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is even desired when we want the rules to be in a standard rule format [5,46]. However, rule formats for DSOS are deferred to future work, discussed in Section 8.1, where one would need to look at more recent works on formats for data [47,22] and for MSOS [15]. The rules for assignment are similar.…”
Section: Read-only Label Categories and A Let Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is even desired when we want the rules to be in a standard rule format [5,46]. However, rule formats for DSOS are deferred to future work, discussed in Section 8.1, where one would need to look at more recent works on formats for data [47,22] and for MSOS [15]. The rules for assignment are similar.…”
Section: Read-only Label Categories and A Let Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. generating algebraic semantics [4,6,22] from specific forms of the transition rules; 2. compositional reasoning results wrt. dynamic logic [51,24] using specific forms of transition rules in the style of [21]; or 3. expressiveness results of the programming constructs specified within various rule formats.…”
Section: Possible Continuationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6.5 as entities in their own right, while in Hybrid χ the traces include 5-tuple configurations and 3-tuple transition labels. This complexity of rule configurations is arguably an impediment to proving equivalences based on the operational semantics, as there are relatively few properties of the language given in [12], however their format has been analysed for meta-theoretical results which we have not attempted here [86,87]. Although Pann is designed to describe specific neural networks and is not as general as Hybrid χ , we intend that the semantic framework is flexible enough to cope with extensions that would be required for other types of behaviour found in realistic neural networks, such as the growth of new neurons (neurogenesis; [88]).…”
Section: Formal Hybrid Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a notable amount of effort put into developing algorithms for axiomatizations for GSOS-like systems [2,3,11], yet all involve several transformations of the original system before deriving the axioms. After implementing one such algorithm in the tool PREG Axiomatizer [4], a simpler method was developed in [18]. We slightly adapt that approach here by using an extended version of the prefix operation and by also showing how to axiomatize operations defined using rules with negative premises, not just positive ones.…”
Section: Axiom Schema Derivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18] we show how to use labels for operating with the data component. For Linda, the set of labels L is extended to triples of the from t D , −, t D ′ , where t D , t D ′ are open data terms from T(Σ D ), standing for the store before and, respectively, after the transition.…”
Section: Linda -Integrating Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%