2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.08.11.503701
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aldy 4: An efficient genotyper and star-allele caller for pharmacogenomics

Abstract: High-throughput sequencing provides sufficient means for determining genotypes of clinically important pharmacogenes that can be used to tailor medical decisions to individual patients. However, pharmacogene genotyping, also known as star-allele calling, is a challenging problem that requires accurate copy number calling, structural variation discovery, variant calling and phasing within each pharmacogene copy present in the sample. Here we introduce Aldy 4, a fast and efficient tool for genotyping pharmacogen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variant phasing for G6PD was done using Aldy v.4.1. 31 , 32 When multiple phasing results were returned, we chose the haplotype that matched the more commonly observed LD structure. For example, for two heterozygotes Aldy considered that the variants c.202G>A and c.376A>G were either on the same or separate alleles, but in these instances we chose the haplotype option with these variants on the same allele because that is more commonly observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variant phasing for G6PD was done using Aldy v.4.1. 31 , 32 When multiple phasing results were returned, we chose the haplotype that matched the more commonly observed LD structure. For example, for two heterozygotes Aldy considered that the variants c.202G>A and c.376A>G were either on the same or separate alleles, but in these instances we chose the haplotype option with these variants on the same allele because that is more commonly observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variant phasing for G6PD was done using Aldy version 4.1. 31,32 When multiple phasing results were returned, we chose the haplotype that matched the more commonly observed LD structure. For example, for a small number of individual(s) Aldy considered that the variants c.202G>A and c.376A>G were either on the same or separate alleles, however in these instances we chose the haplotype option with these variants on the same allele because that is more commonly observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For clinical star (*)-allele calling, all samples were analyzed using Aldy4 with the custom setting ‘pacbio-targeted-hifi-twist’, details of which are described by Hari et al (22, 23). Results were compared to the reference calls from GeT-RM, who provide genetic testing reference materials for PGx.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from MultiQC and VCF files were processed using Rstudio (v 1.3.1056) and Python 3.9.12. Benchmarking was performed for the three GIAB samples using Hap.py v3.12.1 (https://github.com/Illumina/hap.py) and v4.2.1 of the NIST benchmarks (21) For clinical star (*)-allele calling, all samples were analyzed using Aldy4 with the custom setting 'pacbio-targetedhifi-twist', details of which are described by Hari et al (22,23). Results were compared to the reference calls from GeT-RM, who provide genetic testing reference materials for PGx.…”
Section: Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%