Alarm initiated activities

Stanton, Neville A.

doi:10.1201/9780203481714.ch6

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Training Design Recommendations1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1995

2017

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Book3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 14 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These patterns may re¯ect the stages proposed by Stanton (1994b). 66 J. P. Bliss and R. D. Gilson (2) For alarms that are suspected to be false, operators should be trained to verify alarm validity and to inhibit their responses when appropriate (Bliss et al 1996).…”

Section: Training Design Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Emergency signal failure: implications and recommendations

Bliss¹,

Gilson²

1998

Ergonomics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As automation becomes more prevalent in complex task systems, operators are confronted with a myriad of emergency signals. Although much research has been performed to improve the structure and function of signalling systems, it has concerned mainly those stimuli that are presumed to accurately indicate danger. The current report discusses the general area of emergency signal failure, its implications for complex task performance, and recommendations for design and research. A general description of the problem is followed by a review of the applicability of scienti® c theory to human behaviour during and following signal failure, and the authors conclude with recommendations for personnel training and warning signal design and research.

show abstract

Section: Training Design Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%