1982
Airway Resistance of the Voice Button
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
16
1
1
0
Citation Types
0
3
0
0
Year Published
1984
2016
Publication Types
Select...
14
3
Relationship
0
17
Authors
Journals
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
References 4 publications
0
3
0
0
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This depends on the resistance exerted by the valve system and neoglottis and varies from person to person. The resistance exerted by the voice button-neoglottis system is generally ten times greater than the resistance of a normal larynx [22,24,26]. For these reasons, the valves under study were tested at pressures ranging from 0 to 90 cmH 2 O and at air flows ranging from 0 to 0.35 l/s.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This depends on the resistance exerted by the valve system and neoglottis and varies from person to person. The resistance exerted by the voice button-neoglottis system is generally ten times greater than the resistance of a normal larynx [22,24,26]. For these reasons, the valves under study were tested at pressures ranging from 0 to 90 cmH 2 O and at air flows ranging from 0 to 0.35 l/s.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there has been widespread conviction that the lower the inherent valve resistance, the better the phonation. For this reason, there have been various attempts in recent years to design phonatory prostheses with lower inherent resistances [2,3,5,7,9,11,13,17,21,22,29]. Clinical experience, however, has shown that the best prosthesis is not necessarily the one that presents the lowest resistance [29].…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Several studies have concentrated on the differences in in vitro flow and derived resistance parameters between different series of valves (Weinberg, 1982;Weinberg and Moon, 1986) but it has been more difficult to obtain more useful information on the action of these devices whilst being used in vivo during the production of alaryngeal speech. The apparatus described was developed during the course of our studies and was constructed in part by the conversion of a Mercury NR1 Rhinomanometer at an approximate cost of £300.…”
Section: Fig
mentioning
confidence: 99%
