2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2018.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation: Graft-Free Short Tunnel Small Flap versus Scleral Patch Graft after 1-Year Follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 4 ] Kalamkar et al have described use of intra-scleral method for tube fixation, along with a limbal based partial thickness scleral flap (5 mm × 3 mm) at limbus to cover the tube before it entered the anterior chamber. [ 5 ] Comparative series of graft free scleral tunnel versus scleral patch graft by Rivera et al [ 6 ] and Pakravan et al [ 7 ] reported tube erosions in the later, but not in former group of patients. Alternate techniques like use of 6-mm graft free scleral tunnel,[ 8 ] needle-generated scleral tunnel, without a tube-covering patch[ 9 ] and long scleral flap, augmented with Tenon advancement and duplication[ 10 ] have also been described in literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 4 ] Kalamkar et al have described use of intra-scleral method for tube fixation, along with a limbal based partial thickness scleral flap (5 mm × 3 mm) at limbus to cover the tube before it entered the anterior chamber. [ 5 ] Comparative series of graft free scleral tunnel versus scleral patch graft by Rivera et al [ 6 ] and Pakravan et al [ 7 ] reported tube erosions in the later, but not in former group of patients. Alternate techniques like use of 6-mm graft free scleral tunnel,[ 8 ] needle-generated scleral tunnel, without a tube-covering patch[ 9 ] and long scleral flap, augmented with Tenon advancement and duplication[ 10 ] have also been described in literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V roce 1987 publikoval Fredman možnost prevence extruze Moltenovy chlopně za pomoci překrytí sklérou [142], což je dodnes v případě krytí glaukomových implantátů běžně používaná metoda, kterou v různých variacích publikovali i další autoři [143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154]. Lam obdobným způsobem popsal krytí Ahmedovy chlopně [143], Aslanides navrhl v této indikaci využití autologní skléry z důvodu lepší dostupnosti [144] a Zeppa publikoval modifikaci s fixací skléry za pomocí tkáňového lepidla [155].…”
Section: Chirurgie Glaukomuunclassified
“…Další materiály, které byly úspěšně použity při krytí glaukomových implantátů, jsou perikard [145,148,150,[156][157][158][159], dura mater [145,146], rohovka [152,154,156,157,160,161], tragální perichondrium [162], kolagenový implantát Ologen [163], fascia lata femoris [157] nebo amniová membrána [157,158]. Případně lze implantát zavést do sklerálního tunelu, kdy není potřeba žádný další krycí implantát [151,157,164,165]. Zejména rohovka se v poslední době v této indikaci jeví jako výhodná alternativa vzhledem k dobré dostupnosti (jako odpadní produkt refrakčních operací) a dobrému kosmetickému efektu [152].…”
Section: Chirurgie Glaukomuunclassified
“…Alternative techniques to cover the GDD implant during surgery have also been described. In a randomised clinical trial, Pakravan et al [ 37 ] reported the use of a graft-free, short tunnel, small flap method of AGV implantation and compared it with a scleral patch graft. Comparable success rates, including postoperative IOPs, glaucoma medication burden, and complication rates through 1 year, were found with each approach.…”
Section: Glaucoma Drainage Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%