2015
DOI: 10.4148/1051-0834.1045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agriculturists Personal and Business Use of Online Communication Tools

Abstract: New programs and efforts are being promoted to help American farmers and ranchers succeed in their efforts, both in their daily operations and in their attempts to reach consumers. Online communication tools may be one way agriculturists can share their stories and market directly to these audience members, but much is unknown regarding the extent to which these tools are being implemented. The purpose of this study was to determine agriculturists' current use of online communication tools for both personal an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research on agriculture's use of social media found those who are providing the information find this form of online communication to be worthwhile and effective (Meyers et al, 2011;Moore et al, 2015;White et al, 2014). However, others have found only a small number of agriculturists are using social media tools (Doerfert, 2012;Shaw et al, 2015). The current study provides valuable insight into a nascent area of research regarding agriculture's use of a specific form of social mediablogs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research on agriculture's use of social media found those who are providing the information find this form of online communication to be worthwhile and effective (Meyers et al, 2011;Moore et al, 2015;White et al, 2014). However, others have found only a small number of agriculturists are using social media tools (Doerfert, 2012;Shaw et al, 2015). The current study provides valuable insight into a nascent area of research regarding agriculture's use of a specific form of social mediablogs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…These participants started using social media because they wanted to combat negative or incorrect information about agriculture (White et al, 2014). In a study of agriculturists in three states, Shaw et al (2015) found Facebook was the only social media tool used frequently for both personal and business use. Other social media tools such as Twitter, blogs, and photo sharing sites were used less frequently, and the majority of respondents did not use these sites at all for personal or business use.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, others have found only a small number of agriculturists are using social media tools (Doerfert, 2012;Shaw et al, 2015). The current study provides valuable insight into a nascent area of research regarding agriculture's use of a specific form of social mediablogs.…”
Section: Research Research Researchmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These participants started using social media because they wanted to combat negative or incorrect information about agriculture (White et al, 2014). In a study of agriculturists in three states, Shaw et al (2015) found Facebook was the only social media tool used frequently for both personal and business use. Other social media tools such as Twitter, blogs, and photo sharing sites were used less frequently, and the majority of respondents did not use these sites at all for personal or business use.…”
Section: Research Research Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While being present and active on social media is important (Bowman et al, 2020;Gibson et al, 2012;Shaw et al, 2015;White et al, 2014), researchers also need to understand what is being shared, especially given that many agriculturalists view social media as an opportunity to promote the industry (Telg & Barnes, 2012;White et al, 2014). This study focused on ingroup and outgroup identity portrayals on agricultural operations' Facebook pages as they have the potential to affect the public's perceptions of agricultural practices.…”
Section: Introduction and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%