2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement between maternal report and antenatal records for a range of pre and peri-natal factors: The influence of maternal and child characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
147
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
16
147
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If either the mother report or antenatal records endorsed smoking in pregnancy (yes/no), the individual was assigned as a prenatal smoker. Previous work has shown that there is good agreement ( ϭ 0.806) between the 2 data sources in this sample (34). The rate of smoking during pregnancy was 6%.…”
Section: Measures Of Antenatal Predictor Variables Smoking In Pregnasupporting
confidence: 69%
“…If either the mother report or antenatal records endorsed smoking in pregnancy (yes/no), the individual was assigned as a prenatal smoker. Previous work has shown that there is good agreement ( ϭ 0.806) between the 2 data sources in this sample (34). The rate of smoking during pregnancy was 6%.…”
Section: Measures Of Antenatal Predictor Variables Smoking In Pregnasupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Several studies found that maternal recall of smoking during pregnancy is reliable even 10 to 30 years later. [27][28][29][30] Parental report of SHS has been found to be reliable in some [31][32][33] and was found to be underreported in children with asthma 34 ; therefore, although recall bias is possible for in utero and SHS exposures, this may have attenuated the risk estimates because children with asthma were more likely to be in the unexposed group. This potential bias could account for the lack of significant modification of the association between Arg16Gly and asthma by smoking exposures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the effect of time span on birth weight is not as pronounced, 8,9,24 studies highlight the increased inaccuracy with length of recall on data, like gestational age 25 or breastfeeding and feeding practises. 11 In our study, time span showed no effect on the concordance of maternal reports between PQ1 and PQ2.…”
Section: S56mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have investigated the reliability of maternal reports on prenatal, perinatal and on postnatal factors, and suggest that maternal recall data are reproducible for perinatal factors, for example, birth weight, gestational age or medical procedures. 8,9 In contrast, maternal reports on prenatal factors, for example, maternal weight gain during pregnancy, 10 and early infant nutrition, for example, breastfeeding or introduction of solid food, 11,12 showed only moderate agreement or inconsistency in their reliability.Several studies indicated that other factors, for example, time span or the age of the child, have an impact on the repeatability of maternal self-reports. 11,13 Generally, a shorter time span is associated with a higher repeatability of selfreports.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%