2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10015-018-0489-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement algorithm using the trial and error method at the macrolevel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 4 illustrates some examples of the distributions of bias determined by (11). As can be seen, the shape of the bias distribution is a peak determined by the number of options only.…”
Section: B Distribution Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fig. 4 illustrates some examples of the distributions of bias determined by (11). As can be seen, the shape of the bias distribution is a peak determined by the number of options only.…”
Section: B Distribution Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3). [11] We have extended Iwanaga and Namatame model to the best-of-n case with . To avoid confusion, the number of options is written as instead of in following.…”
Section: ( ) : ( )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these methods does not consider to change formation shape of swarm robots adaptively in the environment with obstacles. In addition, there are many methods such as: behavior-based control methods [15,16], virtual structure methods [17,18], leader-follower control methods [19,20], and biological heuristic methods [21,22]. However, these methods have not solved these problems comprehensively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%